Ryan v. United States Department of Justice et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
JENNIFER L. RYAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 3:25-cv-00325-X-BT
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation (FCR) of the United States Magistrate Judge, dated
February 26, 2026 (ECF No. 42). Plaintiff responded to the FCR, indicating
that she “does not object to the FCR’s core jurisdictional conclusions as a
matter of law.” See ECF No. 43, at 1. Even so, Plaintiff’s Response raises
several objections. See id. 2–7. The Court has made a de novo review of those
portions of the FCR to which objections were made. The objections are
overruled. The Court reviewed the remaining portions of the FCR for plain
error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.
SO ORDERED, this 10th day of March, 2026.
Case 3:25-cv-00325-X-BT Document 44 Filed 03/10/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>

BRANTLEY STARR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:25-cv-00325-X-BT Document 44 Filed 03/10/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>