Park Construction and Building Maintenance LLC v. Bureau Veritas Project Management LLC et al

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 	Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
Park Construction and Building
Maintenance, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Bureau Veritas Project
Management, LLC, and Richard
W. Johnson,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 3:23-CV-2270-E-BN
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court conducted an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case,
and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated
January 15, 2026 (ECF No. 83). Defendants Bureau Veritas Project Management LLC and Richard
W. Johnson filed objections (ECF Nos. 84 and 85). The Court reviewed de novo those portions of
the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objection was made, and
reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. The
Court has found no error in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge.
The Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court. IT IS,
THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United
States Magistrate Judge are accepted. The Court also finds that Defendants Bureau Veritas Project
Management LLC and Richard W. Johnson provided evidence that is at least sufficient to support
Case 3:23-cv-02270-E-BN Document 86 Filed 03/20/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 	Page 2 of 2
a jury finding of the citizenship of each party (ECF Nos. 84 and 85). Therefore, Defendants’
Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 70 and 73) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Claims are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.
20 th day of March, 2026.
___________________________________
ADA BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:23-cv-02270-E-BN Document 86 Filed 03/20/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>