USA v. McCray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, §
Plaintiff, :
v. : 2:25-CR-053-X-BR-1
DONALD RAY MCCRAY, :
Defendant. :
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed,! and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for
review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
SO ORDERED on this_“~_ day of March, 2026.
kegBRANTLKY STARR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
! Three pro se documents were filed by Defendant after the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation issued. (ECF 76, 77,
and 78). Setting aside questions of double representation, nothing in those documents could be construed as an
objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation that Defendant be found competent to stand trial.
Case 2:25-cr-00053-X-BR Document 79 Filed 03/04/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>