6:19-cr-00026•USA v. Johnson
Testo completo
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN RYAN JOHNSON § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:19-CR-00026-JDK ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The court referred a petition alleging violations of supervised release conditions to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. At the close of the revocation hearing, U.S. Magistrate Judge Christine L. Stetson recommended: 1. that the court find that Defendant violated the first allegation in the petition that he failed to follow a standard condition of release; 2. revoking Defendant’s supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583; and 3. Defendant should be sentenced to a term of 15 months’ imprisonment with a lifetime of supervised release to follow. The court adopts the magistrate judge’s recommended findings for the imposition of the same standard, mandatory, and special conditions of supervised release previously imposed when the Defendant was originally sentenced, as well as subsequent modifications made to his conditions. At the close of the revocation hearing, the Defendant, defense counsel and counsel for the Government each signed a standard form waiving their right to object to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in the magistrate judge’s report, consenting to revocation of Case 6:19-cr-00026-JDK-KNM Document 48 Filed 03/16/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 supervised release and imposition of the sentence recommended. The Defendant also waived his right to be present with counsel and to speak at sentencing before the Court imposes the recommended sentence. Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition is GRANTED and John Ryan Johnson’s supervised release is REVOKED. Judgment and commitment will be entered separately, in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. So ORDERED and SIGNED this day of ___________________________________ JEREMY D. KERNODLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16th March, 2026. Case 6:19-cr-00026-JDK-KNM Document 48 Filed 03/16/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.