Booker v. Newsome et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
KEDRIEN BOOKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLE EHLER, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:25-CV-43-RWS-JBB
KEDRIEN BOOKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CLEMENTO AMEH, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:25-CV-150-RWS-JBB
KEDRIEN BOOKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TAMMIE NEWSOME, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:25-CV-151-RWS-JBB
ORDER
Plaintiff Kedrien Booker, proceeding pro se, filed the above-referenced civil rights lawsuits
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, complaining of alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights. The cases
were referred to the United States Magistrate Judge J. Boone Baxter in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636.
On January 12, 2026, the Magistrate Judge issued a report and recommendation in each
Case 5:25-cv-00151-RWS-JBB Document 18 Filed 03/06/26 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

Page 2 of 3
case, recommending the cases be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute or to obey
an order of the Court. No. 5:25-cv-43, Docket No. 17; No. 5:25-cv-150, Docket No. 11; No. 5:25-
cv-151, Docket No. 13. Plaintiff received copies of the Reports and Recommendations on January
20, 2026,1 but he has filed no objections to date. Because no objections have been received,
Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and
recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the
unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court.
Duarte v. City of Lewisville, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan,
No. 4:21-CV-00203-RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).
The Court has reviewed the pleadings in these cases and the Reports and Recommendations
of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Reports and
Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,
1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (where no objections to a magistrate judge’s report are filed, the standard of
review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (No. 5:25-cv-
43, Docket No. 17; No. 5:25-cv-150, Docket No. 11; No. 5:25-cv-151, Docket No. 13) are
ADOPTED as the opinions of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED 	that 	the 	above-styled 	civil 	actions 	are 	DISMISSED 	WITHOUT
PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute or to obey an order of the Court.
1 No. 5:25-cv-43, Docket No. 18; No. 5:25-cv-150, Docket No. 12; No. 5:25-cv-151,
Docket No. 15.
Case 5:25-cv-00151-RWS-JBB Document 18 Filed 03/06/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>

Page 3 of 3
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of March, 2026.
Case 5:25-cv-00151-RWS-JBB Document 18 Filed 03/06/26 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
<pageID>