Engel v. Engel et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
CENTRAL DIVISION
SENECA LOVETT ENGEL,
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEREK ENGEL; MILLER POLICE
DEPARTMENT,CITY OF MILLER,SOUTH
DAKOTA; JIM HENSON,IN HIS
INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY;
SHANNON SPECK,IN HIS OR HER
INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY;
AND VARIOUS JOHN AND JANE DOES OF
THE MILLER POLICE DEPARTMENT,IN
THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL
CAPACITIES,
Defendants.
3:21-CV-03020-RAL
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
Plaintiff, Seneca Lovett Engel, filed a lawsuit against defendants imder 42 U.S.C.
§§ 1983 and 1985 and alleges state-law claims under supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1367. Doc. 1. Engel moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and has filed a
financial affidavit. Doc. 2.
A federal court may authorize the commencement of any lawsuit without prepayment of
fees when an applicant submits an affidavit stating he or she is unable to pay the costs ofthe
lawsuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). "[I]n forma pauperis status does not require a litigant to
demonstrate absolute destitution." Lee v. McDonald's Corp.. 231 F.3d 456,459(8th Cir. 2000).
But in forma pauperis status is a privilege, not a right. Williams v. McKenzie. 834 F.2d 152, 154
(8th Cir. 1987). Determining whether an applicant is sufficiently impoverished to qualify to
Case 3:21-cv-03020-RAL Document 10 Filed 11/24/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>

proceed in forma pauperis under § 1915 is committed to the sound discretion ofthe district court.
Cross V. Gen. Motors Corp.. 721 F.2d 1152, 1157(8th Cir. 1983). After review of Engel's
financial affidavit, the Court finds that she has insufficient funds to pay the entire filing fee, but
that she does have sufficient income to pay the fee over time. Thus, Engel's motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Engel need not pay an initial partial filing fee, but she will
be responsible for $20 payments every month until her filing fee is paid in full.
Ordinarily, when a plaintiff is granted in forma pauperis status under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(a), this Court must then screen the complaint to determine if the complaint should be
dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or if service should be directed. Martin-Trigona v.
Stewart. 691 F.2d 856, 857(8th Cir. 1982). Although some of her claims may not be meritorious
or within the jurisdiction of a federal court, she has already served the defendants, some of whom
have filed an answer to her complaint. Docs. 5-9. Thus, this Court will forego the conventional
screening ofthe complaint. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Engel's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 2, is granted, and her
initial filing fee is waived. Engel shall pay her filing fee in $20 monthly installments beginning
with an installment due January 15, 2022, and with $20 installments paid monthly thereafter to
the Clerk of Court.
DATED November 2021.
BY THE COURT:
fny-
ROBERTO A. LANGE
CHIEF JUDGE
Case 3:21-cv-03020-RAL Document 10 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>