USA v. White Horse et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA
CENTRAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3:20-CR-30058-RAL
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEROME WHITE HORSE,JR.,
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS
Defendant.
Defendant Jerome White Horse, Jr., moved to suppress statements he made from use at
trial. Doc. 105. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Moreno issued a report and recommendation on
February II, 2021, recommending that White Horse's motion be denied. Doc. 115.
This Court reviews a report and recommendation pursuant to the statutory standards found
in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which provides in relevant part that "[a]judge of the [district] court shall
make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or
recommendations to which objection is made." However, "[i]n the absence of an objection, the
district court is not required 'to give any more consideration to the magistrate's report than the
court considers appropriate.'" United States v. Murillo-Figueroa. 862 F. Supp. 2d 863, 866(N.D.
Iowa 2012)(quoting Thomas v. Am.474 U.S. 140, 150(1985)).
White Horse has not objected to the report and recommendation and the fourteen days for
doing so has now passed.
Accordingly, it is hereby
Case 3:20-cr-30058-RAL Document 121 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation for Disposition of Motion to Suppress,
Doc. 115, is adopted. It is further
ORDERED that White Horse's Motion to Suppress, Doc. 105, is denied.
DATED this _/ day of March, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
ROBERTO A. LANGE
CHIEF JUDGE
Case 3:20-cr-30058-RAL Document 121 Filed 03/01/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>