Pauletta v. Officer Sanguinito et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT PAULETTA,
Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER SANGUINITO, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil No. 1:24-CV-01299
Judge Jennifer P. Wilson
MEMORANDUM
Before the court is the report and recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Sean A. Camoni recommending that Defendants’ motions to
dismiss be granted and Plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed with
prejudice. (Doc. 42.) No party has filed objections to the report and
recommendation, resulting in the forfeiture of de novo review by this court. Nara
v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d
874, 878–79 (3d Cir. 1987)).
Following an independent review of the report and record, and affording
“reasoned consideration” to the uncontested portions of the report, EEOC v. City of
Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Henderson, 812 F.2d at
879), to “satisfy [the court] that there is no clear error on the face of the record,”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, the court finds that Judge
Camoni’s analysis is well-reasoned and fully supported by the record and
Case 1:24-cv-01299-JPW Document 43 Filed 03/02/26 Page 1 of 2

2
applicable law. Accordingly, the court will adopt the report and recommendation,
Doc. 42, grant the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Officer Sanguinito and
Andrew Parsons, Doc. 34, grant the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Michael
Carroll, Doc. 35, dismiss Plaintiff’s second amended complaint with prejudice,
Doc. 32, and close this case. An appropriate order follows.
s/Jennifer P. Wilson
JENNIFER P. WILSON
United States District Judge
Middle District of Pennsylvania
Dated: March 2, 2026
Case 1:24-cv-01299-JPW Document 43 Filed 03/02/26 Page 2 of 2