Brooks et al v. Community Strategies Inc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
DAN BROOKS, et al., 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-25-1209-SLP
)
COMMUNITY STRATEGIES INC. 	)
d/b/a EPIC CHARTER SCHOOLS, 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
O R D E R
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 11]
and Defendant’s Motion to Enforce [Doc. No. 12] filed on October 20, 2025. 	On
November 3, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13]. 	“The
[A]mended [C]omplaint, as the operative complaint, supersedes the original complaint’s
allegations[.]” 	May v. Segovia, 929 F.3d 1223, 1229 (10th Cir. 2019). 	Thus, those
allegations are of “no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th
Cir. 1991) (quoting Int’l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 556 F.2d 665, 668 (2d Cir. 1977)).
Therefore, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 11] and Motion to Enforce [Doc. No.
12] are DENIED AS MOOT.1
1 Plaintiffs filed Notices asserting that no response is necessary to Defendant’s Motions because
they are moot in light of the Amended Complaint. See [Doc. Nos. 14 and 15]. Plaintiffs further
state that the Motion to Enforce is moot because the Amended Complaint “does not contain any
claims arising under state law which were allegedly released by the claimed settlement
agreements.” [Doc. No. 14]. Although the Court denies Defendant’s Motion to Enforce as moot,
the parties should not construe this Order as agreeing with Plaintiffs’ statement or characterization
of the claims. Defendant may refile its motions pursuant to the applicable rules, if necessary.
Case 5:25-cv-01209-SLP Document 16 Filed 11/04/25 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS SO ORDERED this 4 th day of November, 2025.
Case 5:25-cv-01209-SLP Document 16 Filed 11/04/25 Page 2 of 2