Tigner v. FedEx Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
TIFFENEY TIGNER, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-25-945-R
)
FEDEX CORPORATION, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Federal Express Corporation1
[Doc. No. 17]. During the pendency of the Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint2
[Doc. No. 27]. This Amended Complaint “supersedes the original and renders it of no legal
effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991) (internal
quotation omitted).
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 17] is therefore DENIED without
prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2026.
1 Plaintiff named FedEx Corp. as the Defendant in this action. However, Federal Express
Corporation (seemingly Plaintiff’s actual employer and a corporation held by FedEx
Corp.), whom Plaintiff names as the allegedly proper Defendant in her amended pleading,
appears to have filed the at-issue Motion to Dismiss.
2 Though Plaintiff entitles her Amended Complaint the “Second Amended Complaint,” this
is the first amended pleading Plaintiff has actually filed since her Original Complaint on
August 20, 2025.
Case 5:25-cv-00945-R Document 28 Filed 04/01/26 Page 1 of 1