Nguyen v. DeJoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
QUANG D. NGUYEN, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Case No. CIV-22-1102-D
)
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss challenging the sufficiency of
Plaintiff’s original pleading pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 	[Doc.
No. 11]. 	In response to the Motion, Plaintiff has timely filed an amended pleading as
authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). This amendment “supersedes the original and
renders it of no legal effect.” Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir.
1991) (internal quotation omitted); see Predator Int’l, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.,
793 F.3d 1177, 1180-81 (10th Cir. 2015); Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir.
2007). Thus, Defendant’s Motion is moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc.
No. 11] is DENIED without prejudice to resubmission, if appropriate, in response to the
First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 12].
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24 th day of May, 2023.
Case 5:22-cv-01102-D Document 14 Filed 05/24/23 Page 1 of 1