United States of America v. Cifuentes-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CR-19-364-G
)
ROLANDO CIFUENTES-LOPEZ, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER
On April 19, 2021, the Court entered judgment upon the guilty plea of Defendant
Rolando Cifuentes-Lopez to two counts of Child Sex Trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1591(a)(1), (b)(2), 1594(a), 2. See J. (Doc. No. 54). The Government filed a Motion
for Restitution (Doc. No. 38). Defendant has responded (Doc. No. 40), and the
Government has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 41).
On June 9, 2021, the Court granted the Government’s unopposed request to stay its
decision on the Motion and to continue the hearing pending a decision by the Tenth Circuit
Court of Appeals in United States v. Anthony, No. 21-6015 (10th Cir. filed Feb. 4, 2021).
See Order of June 9, 2021 (Doc. No. 67). The Court directed the Government to file a
written status report advising the Court of any developments within seven days of the Tenth
Circuit’s issuance of a decision in Anthony. See id.
On January 18, 2022, the Government filed a Notice (Doc. No. 79) informing the
Court that a published decision had been issued in Anthony and asking that restitution
Case 5:19-cr-00364-G Document 80 Filed 02/14/22 Page 1 of 3

2
proceedings resume in this matter. See United States v. Anthony, 22 F.4th 943 (10th Cir.
2022). The Tenth Circuit’s Mandate in Anthony issued on February 3, 2022.
The Government previously represented that this appellate decision may provide
additional guidance as to the Court’s application of the statutory causation standard and
the calculation of restitution in this matter. Accordingly, the Court finds that the
Government should file an amended motion for restitution, updating its request to consider
the applicability of Anthony and to reflect any other changes that may be warranted.
Defendant shall be permitted to respond to such amended motion prior to the Court hearing
argument on the restitution request.
Further, in light of the current emergency conditions present due to the COVID-19
pandemic, the Court finds that the possibility of conducting the hearing on the
Government’s Motion via video teleconferencing should be considered. See Gen. Order
No. 20-9.1 (W.D. Okla. Mar. 31, 2020) (authorizing felony sentencings to be conducted
via video teleconferencing, or telephone conferencing if video teleconferencing is not
reasonably available, “with the consent of the defendant after consultation with counsel”
and upon specific findings by the presiding judge); Gen. Order No. 21-5.3 (W.D. Okla.
Dec. 2, 2021) (extending the authorizations of General Order No. 20-9.1 for an additional
90 days).
ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
(1) Within 14 days of the date of this Order, the Government shall file an amended
motion for restitution, as outlined above. Defendant may respond to the amended
motion within 14 days of the date of filing.
Case 5:19-cr-00364-G Document 80 Filed 02/14/22 Page 2 of 3

3
(2) Within 21 days of the date of this Order, Defendant’s counsel shall consult with
Defendant and shall notify the Court as to whether Defendant consents to the
hearing on the Government’s request for restitution being conducted via video
teleconferencing pursuant to this Court’s General Orders.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2022.
Case 5:19-cr-00364-G Document 80 Filed 02/14/22 Page 3 of 3