USA v. Crump et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:24-cr-13-1
vs.
CHASE ALEXANDER CRUMP, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
Defendant.
ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. No. 94); (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR A CHANGE OF PLEA (Doc. No. 89); (3) ACCEPTING DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF
GUILTY AS CHARGED IN COUNTS 1 AND 2 OF THE INDICTMENT; AND (4)
DEFERRING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO ACCEPT THE PLEA AGREEMENT
UNTIL THE SENTENCING HEARING
This criminal case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 94), recommending that the Court accept Defendant’s guilty plea. There
being no objections, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. 	Defendant’s
motion to change plea (Doc. No. 89) is GRANTED, and the Court ACCEPTS Defendant’s plea of
guilty as charged in Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment, which charge him with conspiracy to commit
a Title 21 offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 841(b)(1)(C), and 846, and
with distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and
841(b)(1)(C). 	The Court DEFERS the decision of whether to accept the plea agreement until the
sentencing hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
December 5, 2025 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:24-cr-00013-MJN-CHG Doc #: 97 Filed: 12/05/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>