USA v. Hall

3:20-cr-00114Ohsd11 feb 2026

Testo completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff, 	Case No. 3:20-cr-114
vs.
DAVONTAE HALL, 	District Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER: (1) FINDING DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF HIS
SUPERVISED RELEASE; (2) REVOKING ANY TIME REMAINING ON
DEFENDANT’S TERM OF SUPERVISED RELEASE; (3) SENTENCING DEFENDANT
TO A 12-MONTH TERM OF IMPRISONMENT WITH NO SUPERVISED RELEASE
TO FOLLOW; AND (4) CONFIRMING THIS CASE REMAINS TERMINATED ON
THE DOCKET
______________________________________________________________________________
During late March 2025, Defendant in this felony criminal case was serving a total term of
3 years supervised release. 	See Doc. No. 21. 	On October 31, 2025, Defendant’s supervising
probation officer submitted an amended petition informing the Court that on July 22, 2025,
Defendant pled guilty in a separate federal case, USA v. Davontae Hall, 3:25-cr-37, to possession
of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(8). Doc. No.
26 at PageID 163-64; see 3:25-cr-37, Doc. No. 26.
As a result of Defendant’s guilty plea, the Court issued a warrant for his arrest in the instant
case. Doc. No. 24. On January 14, 2026, the Court held a final supervised release violation hearing
during which Defendant appeared, AFPD Arthur Mullins appeared on behalf of Defendant, and
AUSA Brent Tabacchi appeared on behalf of the Government. See USA v. Davontae Hall, 3:25-
cr-37, Minute Entry (Jan. 14, 2026). 	Probation Officers Ashlei Lang and Jennifer Wright were
also present. During this hearing, Defendant admitted to violating the condition of his supervised
release that required him not to commit another federal, state, or local crime. See id. Pursuant to
Case: 3:20-cr-00114-MJN Doc #: 27 Filed: 02/11/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>
2
the record of Defendant’s final supervised release hearing, the Court: (1) FINDS Defendant in
violation of the conditions of his supervised release; (2) REVOKES any time remaining on his
current term of supervised release; and (3) SENTENCES Defendant to a 12-month term of
imprisonment with no supervised release to follow.
The case remains TERMINATED on the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 11, 2026 	s/Michael J. Newman
Hon. Michael J. Newman
United States District Judge
Case: 3:20-cr-00114-MJN Doc #: 27 Filed: 02/11/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.