Muhammad v. The Hartford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
HANEEF MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE HARTFORD,
Defendant.
Civil Action 2:25-cv-1323
Judge Douglas R. Cole
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Restore PACER Access and
Electronic Filing Privileges and Notice of Unconstitutional Restrictions. (ECF No. 12.)
Plaintiff’s e-filing privileges were revoked in a related case after he made numerous, often
duplicative, filings in that matter in contravention of this Court’s Orders. (See Haneef
Muhammad v. Gap, Inc. et al., 2:24-cv-3676-DRC-CMV, ECF No. 107.) However, Plaintiff has
not been granted e-filing privileges in this case, and therefore, he has no e-filing privileges that
can be restored here. Moreover, any challenge he makes to the revocation of his e-filing
privileges in the related case must be in that matter. The Court further notes that Plaintiff remains
able to file documents in both cases by personally delivering or mailing them to the Clerk’s
office. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 12) is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura
CHELSEY M. VASCURA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 2:25-cv-01323-DRC-CMV Doc #: 20 Filed: 11/24/25 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>