Muhammad v. The Kroger Co. et al

2:24-cv-04247Ohsd26 feb 2026

Testo completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
HANEEF MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE KROGER CO., et al.,
Defendants.
Civil Action 2:24-cv-4247
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Submit Video Evidence of Minor
Child’s Statement Before City Council (ECF No. 39). Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature, because Plaintiff is not offering the video evidence in
support of any identified pending motion or hearing. If Plaintiff wishes to submit the video
evidence in support of a future motion or hearing, Plaintiff may renew his motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Chelsey M. Vascura
CHELSEY M. VASCURA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 2:24-cv-04247-MHW-CMV Doc #: 56 Filed: 02/26/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.