Hale v. Shawnee Counseling Center et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI
MICHAEL EUGENE HALE,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SHAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:25-cv-964
District Judge Douglas R. Cole
Magistrate Judge Caroline H. Gentry
DEFICIENCY ORDER
Plaintiff, an inmate at the Washington County Detention Center in Fayetteville, Arkansas,
has filed two motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docs. 1, 7), in connection with a
pro se personal injury Complaint filed in this Court, (Doc. 1-1, Complaint, refiled as Doc. 7-1).
This matter is before the Court to address two deficiencies.
First, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)-
(h), a prisoner seeking to bring a civil action without prepayment of fees or security therefor must
submit an application and affidavit to proceed without prepayment of fees and a certified copy of
their 	trust 	fund 	account 	statement 	(or 	institutional 	equivalent) 	for 	the 	six-month 	period
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the cashier of the prison at which
the prisoner is or was confined. 	28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
In this case, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete because
Plaintiff has not provided a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the preceding six-
month period as required by the PLRA. 	Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to pay $405 ($350
filing fee plus $55 administrative fee) or submit to the Court a completed Application and Affidavit
Case: 1:25-cv-00964-DRC-CHG Doc #: 8 Filed: 02/17/26 Page: 1 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>

2
By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form, including a certified copy
of his prison trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the preceding six-month
period within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.
The CLERK OF COURT is DIRECTED to provide Plaintiff with an Application and
Affidavit By Incarcerated Person to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees form. 	The CLERK
OF COURT is further DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the cashier of the detention
center at which Plaintiff is confined.
Second, the Complaint is not signed by Plaintiff. 	Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, every
pleading, written motion, and other paper shall be signed by the party if not represented by counsel.
Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to return the original Complaint to Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is ORDERED to sign the Complaint and return it to the Clerk of Court within thirty (30)
days if he wishes to file a complaint in this matter.
If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court shall dismiss his case for want
of prosecution. In re Prison Litigation Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131 (6th Cir. 1997). 	If Plaintiff’s
case is dismissed for failure to comply with this Order, the case will not be reinstated to the Court’s
active docket despite the payment of the filing fee. 	Id. 	Should Plaintiff need additional time to
comply with this Order, he should file a motion for an extension of time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 	February 17, 2026 	/s/ Caroline H. Gentry
Caroline H. Gentry
United States Magistrate Judge
Case: 1:25-cv-00964-DRC-CHG Doc #: 8 Filed: 02/17/26 Page: 2 of 2 PAGEID #: <pageID>