USA v. Ojeda-Elenes, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	) 	CASE NO. 1:23-cr-95
)
)
PLAINTIFF, 	) 	CHIEF JUDGE SARA LIOI
)
vs. 	)
)
)
JUDGMENT ENTRY
CAMERON HARRIS, 	)
)
)
DEFENDANT. 	)
For the reasons set forth in the contemporaneously filed Memorandum Opinion and Order,
Harris’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (Doc. No. 139) is DENIED. Further,
for the same reasons, the Court concludes that “jurists of reason” would not find it “debatable
whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or that the Court’s
findings are “correct[.]” See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L. Ed. 2d
542 (2000). Additionally, the Court has detailed why Harris’s grounds for relief are otherwise
belied by the record such that “reasonable jurists” would not debate the Court’s denial of his
motion to vacate. Id. Accordingly, the Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not
be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 29, 2025
HONORABLE SARA LIOI
CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 1:23-cr-00095-SL Doc #: 148 Filed: 12/29/25 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>