Gregory E. Miller and Suzanne M. Miller

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
In Re:
Gregory E. Miller and
Suzanne M. Miller,
Debtors.
) 	Case No. 10-30025
)
) 	Chapter 7
)
)
) 	JUDGE MARY ANN WHIPPLE
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TURNOVER
This case is before the court on the Chapter 7 Trustee’s Motion for Turnover (“Motion”) [Doc. # 46].
In the Motion, the Trustee seeks an order directing Creditor “Chase” to turnover funds in the amount of
$5,871.48. The basis of the Trustee’s Motion is his contention that the funds represent preference payments
received by Chase. Debtor’s certificate of service states that the Motion was served on Chase Card Services,
N.A. by ordinary U.S. mail. 	Chase has not opposed the Motion within the time set forth in the notice
appended to it and as required by the local bankruptcy rules. Nevertheless, the Motion is procedurally
defective.
Under Bankruptcy Rule 7001, “a proceeding to recover money or property, other than a proceeding
to compel the debtor to deliver property to the trustee, or a proceeding under § 554(b) or § 725 of the Code,
Rule 2017, or Rule 6002,” must be brought by adversary proceeding, which is commenced by a properly
filed and served complaint. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7001(1) and 7003; see, also, Camall Co. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.
(In re Camall Co.), 16 Fed. Appx. 403 (6th Cir. 2001) (affirming bankruptcy court’s decision denying a
motion for turnover because it was filed as a motion rather than as an adversary proceeding as required
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings
and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document has been
entered electronically in the record of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio.
Dated: May 16 2011
10-30025-maw Doc 50 FILED 05/16/11 ENTERED 05/16/11 16:04:35 Page 1 of 2

2
under Rule 7001); In re Perkins, 902 F.2d 1254, 1258 (7th Cir. 1990) (finding that a turnover order entered
in an action commenced by motion rather than by complaint must be vacated) ; In re Wheeler Tech., Inc.,
139 B.R. 235, 239 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1992) (vacating bankruptcy court’s order for turnover because
proceeding was “inappropriately brought by . . .motion where an adversary proceeding is required”); In re
Barringer, 244 B.R. 402, 410 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999); In re Riding, 44 B.R. 846, 859 (Bankr. Utah 1984)
(stating that “[t]he Bankruptcy Rules mandate that the court await the commencement of an adversary
proceeding before determining whether turnover shall be required”). 	None of the exceptions to Rule
7001(1) are applicable in this case. Thus, Rule 7001 required Debtor to file its request for turnover as an
adversary proceeding, subject to the procedural rules governing such proceedings, including rules governing
service of the summons and complaint in Bankruptcy Rule 7004.
THEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the Trustee’s Motion [Doc. # 46] be, and hereby is, DENIED, without
prejudice.
10-30025-maw Doc 50 FILED 05/16/11 ENTERED 05/16/11 16:04:35 Page 2 of 2