Tweedy v. RTI International

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
DAVID C. TWEEDY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
RTI INTERNATIONAL,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:24-cv-7202 (ALC)
TRANSFER ORDER
------------------------------------------------------------
ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:
Plaintiff David Tweedy (“Plaintiff”) brings this employment discrimination case for
alleged violations that occurred while he was working in Brooklyn, New York. During a January
21, 2026 telephonic conference, Plaintiff and Defendant did not object to having this case
transferred to the Eastern District of New York. Consequently, this action is transferred to the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, this action may be brought in “(1) a judicial district where any
defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located,” or
“(2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim
occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated.” 	Since
Plaintiff alleges that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claims occurred
in Brooklyn, which is located in the Eastern District of New York, the action should be and hereby
is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. 	28 U.S.C.
§§ 1391(b), 1406(a).
Case 1:26-cv-00376-AMD-JRC Document 25 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
SO ORDERED.
Dated: 	January 21, 2026 	___________________________________
New York, New York 	ANDREW L. CARTER, JR.
United States District Judge
Case 1:26-cv-00376-AMD-JRC Document 25 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>