Rosas et al v. TRCU Coffee LLC et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------x
RUPERTO ROSAS ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
-against-
TRCU COFFEE LLC ET AL.,
Defendants.
------------------------------------x
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
23-CV-5712 (EK)(SDE)
ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge:
The Court has received Magistrate Judge Eichenholtz’s
Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated January 13, 2026. 	Judge
Eichenholtz recommends that the Court grant Plaintiffs’ motion
to strike Defendants’ answer to the complaint. 	Neither party
has filed objections and the time to do so has expired.
Accordingly, the Court reviews Judge Eichenholtz’s
recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. 	See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983
addition; accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968
F. Supp. 2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013).
Having reviewed the record, I find no error and
therefore adopt the R&R in its entirety. 	Thus, the Clerk of
Case 1:23-cv-05712-EK-SDE Document 39 Filed 02/03/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Court is respectfully directed to strike Defendants’ answer to
the complaint, ECF No. 13.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eric Komitee
ERIC KOMITEE
United States District Judge
Dated: 	February 3, 2026
Brooklyn, New York
Case 1:23-cv-05712-EK-SDE Document 39 Filed 02/03/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>