Mills v. Bluth

1:26-cv-00162Nhd10 apr 2026

Testo completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Anthony Mills
v.
Arlene Bluth
Case No. 26-cv-162-TSM
ORDER
No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Talesha L. Saint-Marc dated March
12, 2026. For the reasons explained therein, this case is dismissed.
The clerk shall enter judgement and close this case. “‘[O]nly those
issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are
subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by
such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v.
United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting
Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st
Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6
(1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific
objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).
____________________________
Samantha D. Elliott
Chief Judge
Date: April 10, 2026
cc: Anthony Mills, pro se
Case 1:26-cv-00162-SE-TSM Document 4 Filed 04/10/26 Page 1 of 1

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.