USA v. Perdomo et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
EDUARDO JOSE PERDOMO,
MICHEL MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ,
ALFREDO ZAMBRANO-HURTADO,
SUMIT CHAUDHARI, KAVANKUMAR PATEL,
and VISHAL GOSWAMI,
Defendants.
8:25CR70
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on defendant Eduardo Jose Perdomo’s Unopposed Motion
to Continue Trial (Filing No. 98). Counsel continues to receive discovery and needs additional
time to review discovery and to reach a negotiation. The government and counsel for all co-
defendants have no objection to the continuance. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [98] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, for all defendants, now set for December 15, 2025, is continued to March
2, 2026.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will
be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the
defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this
motion, that is, the time between today’s date and March 2, 2026, shall be deemed
excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act.
Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for
effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(6), (7)(A) & (B)(iv).
3. No further continuances will be granted barring exceptional circumstances.
Dated this 26th day of November, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge
8:25-cr-00070-JFB-MDN Doc # 99 Filed: 11/26/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>