USA v. Saravia et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ADRIANA ZEPEDA RIVERA,
Defendant.
4:25CR3033
ORDER
A telephone status conference was held today. During the telephone conference,
defense counsel notified the court that Defendant needs additional time to consider and
decide whether to enter a guilty plea or go to trial. Defendant moved to continue the status
conference. The government did not object. Based on the comments of counsel, the court
finds good cause has been shown and the oral motion to continue should be granted.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) 	A telephonic conference with counsel will be held before the undersigned
magistrate judge at 8:45 a.m. on December 8, 2025 to discuss setting any
change of plea hearing or the date of the jury trial. Counsel for the parties
shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to participate
in the call.
2) 	In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends
of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the
interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Any additional
time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time
between today’s date and December 8, 2025, shall be deemed excludable
time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial
Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time
necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due
diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv). Failing to timely object to this
order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of
any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the
Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 27th day of October, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
United States Magistrate Judge
4:25-cr-03033-SMB-JMD Doc # 71 Filed: 10/27/25 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID #
<pageID>