USA v. Bailey et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
United States of America, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON
) 	DETAINERS ORDER
vs. 	)
) 	Case No.: 1:17-cr-130
Natasha Larae Youngbird, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
On August 24, 2017, defendant made her initial appearance and was arraigned in the above-
entitled action. AUSA Rick Volk appeared on the Government’s behalf. Attorney Mark C. Sherer
was appointed to represent defendant in ths matter and appeared on defendant’s behalf.
Prior to her initial appearance, defendant was incarcerated by the State of North Dakota at
the Dakota Women's Correctional and Rehabilitation Center ("DWCRC") in New England, North
Dakota. After the Indictment in this case was returned and an arrest warrant issued, a detainer was
filed by the United States with the North Dakota prison officials. 	Pursuant to the Interstate
Agreement on Detainers Act (“IADA”), defendant’s appearance before this court for her initial
appearance and arraignment was secured by a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum.
At her initial appearance and arraignment, defendant was advised of her rights under the
IADA to continued federal custody until the charges set forth in the Indictment are adjudicated.
After consulting with counsel, defendant waived in open court the anti-shuttling provisions of the
IADA and agreed to return to the DWCRC.
Based on defendant’s waiver, the court finds that she knowingly and intelligently,
voluntarily, and upon advice of counsel waived the anti-shuttling provisions of the IADA and agreed
1
Case 1:17-cr-00130-DLH Document 100 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 2

to return to the custody of the State of North Dakota (the “sending state” under the IADA) at the
DWCRC pending further proceedings in this case initiated by the United States (the “receiving
state” under the IADA)..
Accordingly, the court ORDERS that defendant be housed in the “sending state” under the
IADA pending further proceedings or until further order of the court. 	Further, pursuant to
defendant’s waiver, the return of the defendant to her place of incarceration pending trial shall not
be grounds under the IADA for dismissal of the charges set forth in the Indictment.
Dated this 24th day of August, 2017.
/s/ Charles S. Miller, Jr.
Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:17-cr-00130-DLH Document 100 Filed 08/24/17 Page 2 of 2