USA v. Morris et al

OAO 247 (NC/W 03/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western District of North Carolina
United States of America )
)
)
)
)
)
v.
BRENT M ICHAEL GREEN Case No: 3:03CR16-4
USM No: 19276-058
Date of Previous Judgment: December 16, 2003, Charles Brewer
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of ê the defendant í the Director of the Bureau of Prisons í the court under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has
subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
í DENIED. ê GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in
the last judgment issued) of 180 months is reduced to 143 months .
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Offense Level: 37 Amended Offense Level: 35
Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: II
Previous Guideline Range: 235 to 293 months Amended Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
í The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
ê The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time
of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the
amended guideline range.
í Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Upon release from imprisonment, and absent a residential plan accepted by the U.S. Probation Officer prior to release
from incarceration, it is ordered that as a condition of supervised release the defendant shall submit to the local
Residential Reentry Center for a period not to exceed 90 days, with work release, at the direction of the U.S. Probation
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated December 16, 2003, shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order Date: January 4, 2010
Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
Case 3:03-cr-00016-MU Document 146 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 1