Loyda Elizabeth Polanco-Pimentel

8:07-bk-02251Nceb28 ago 2007

Testo completo

1 Section 521(i)(1) provides, in relevant part, that "if an individual debtor in a voluntary case
under chapter 7 or 13 fails to file all of the information required under subsection (a)(1) within 45
days after the date of the filing of the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective
on the 46th day after the date of the filing of the petition."
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
WILMINGTON DIVISION
IN RE:
LOYDA ELIZABETH POLANCO-PIMENTEL,
Debtor.
CASE NO.
07-02251-8-JRL
ORDER
The matter before the court is the debtor's motion to reconsider the order dismissing this case
entered on August 6, 2007. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied.
On June 20, 2007, the debtor filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code. On June 21, 2007, the court sent the debtor a deficiency notice for missing schedules and
statements, noting that the case would be subject to automatic dismissal pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §
521(i) if the required documents were not timely filed. 1
The debtor failed to file the missing schedules and statements, and the case was
automatically dismissed pursuant to § 521(i) on August 6, 2007. On August 24, 2007, the debtor
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 28 day of August, 2007.
________________________________________
J. Rich Leonard
United States Bankruptcy Judge
____________________________________________________________
Case 07-02251-8-JRL Doc 23 Filed 08/28/07 Entered 08/28/07 13:39:12 Page 1 of 2
2
filed a motion to reinstate the case, asserting that it was due to her attorney’s inadvertent computer
error that all schedules and statements were not filed.
"There is no provision other than § 521(i)(4) [which provides that on the motion of the
trustee made within the 45-day period the court may decline to dismiss the case under certain
circumstances] that gives the court the authority not to dismiss the case if the required documents
are not filed." In re Woodard, Case No. 05-06092-5-ATS (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2006). In this
case, like in Woodard, no party filed a motion not to dismiss the case prior to the expiration of the
45-day period, and the trustee has not indicated that the best interest of creditors would be served
by administration of the estate. Accordingly, the court does not find any authority to support the
debtor's request.
Based on the foregoing, the motion to reconsider is DENIED.
END OF DOCUMENT
Case 07-02251-8-JRL Doc 23 Filed 08/28/07 Entered 08/28/07 13:39:12 Page 2 of 2

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.