Cooley v. City of Saint Louis et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
)
JEROME COOLEY, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	No. 4:25-CV-910 JSD
)
v. 	)
)
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, etc. 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
On January 12, 2026, Defendants Edward Young and Cheryl Pogue filed a Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 49). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to Defendants Young and Pogue’s
Motion to Dismiss.1
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than
April 1, 2026, as to why he has not provided his opposition to Defendants Young and Pogue’s
Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 49). Plaintiff shall also file a memorandum in opposition to
Defendants Young and Pogue’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 49) no later than April 1, 2026.
Failure to do so will result in the Court ruling on Defendants’ unopposed Motion to Dismiss
and/or possible dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute.
Dated this 24th day of March, 2026.
JOSEPH S. DUEKER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1 E.D. Mo. L.R. 4.01(B) provides that “each party opposing a motion … must file, within
fourteen (14) days after service of the motion, a single memorandum containing any relevant
argument and citations to authorities on which the party relies.”
Case: 4:25-cv-00910-JSD Doc. #: 65 Filed: 03/24/26 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>