0:26-cv-01513•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Testo completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MARIO RENE LOPEZ GARCIA, Petitioner, vs. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, et al., Respondents. 0:26-CV-1513 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS The petitioner is a noncitizen currently detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He contends his detention is unlawful because she was denied a bond hearing pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1(d)(1) and 1236.1(d)(1). See filing 1. The government responds that detention is mandatory, not discretionary, and the petitioner is not eligible to be released. See filing 4. The briefing demonstrates that the petitioner's application for the writ only presents issue of law—and the government does not dispute this point, , see filing 4 at 2—so the Court declines to hold a hearing. See § 2243. The Court will conditionally grant the petition for the reasons thoroughly articulated by the undersigned in Velasco Hurtado v. Bondi, No. 0:26-CV-546, 2026 WL 184884 (D. Minn. Jan. 24, 2026).1 1 A petitioner seeking release from immigration detention shall be awarded costs and reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), unless the Court finds that the government's position was substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust. See Michelin v. Warden Moshannon Valley Corr. Ctr., No. 24-2990, 2026 WL 263483 (3d Cir. Feb. 2, 2026); see also, e.g., Yeferson G.C. v. Easterwood, No. 25-CV-4814, 2026 WL 207266, at *3 (D. Minn. Jan. 21), report and CASE 0:26-cv-01513-JMG-JFD Doc. 5 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 2
2 IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) is conditionally granted. 2. The government shall provide the petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and the corresponding regulations on or before March 2, 2026. 3. If the government does not provide the petitioner with a bond hearing as required, the petitioner must be immediately released from detention. 4. On or before March 4, 2026, the government shall provide the Court with a status update regarding the bond hearing or, if no bond hearing was held, advise the Court regarding the petitioner's release. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated this 23rd day of February, 2026. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard Senior United States District Judge recommendation adopted, 2026 WL 209825 (D. Minn. Jan. 27, 2026); Mairena-Munguia v. Arnott, No. 25-CV-3318, 2025 WL 3229132, at *5 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 19, 2025); cf. Bah v. Cangemi, 548 F.3d 680 (8th Cir. 2008) (evaluating the merits of immigration habeas petitioner's EAJA claim). Any motion for costs and fees pursuant to the EAJA in this case should be filed within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See § 2412(d)(1)(B). CASE 0:26-cv-01513-JMG-JFD Doc. 5 Filed 02/23/26 Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.