Medina Martinez v. Raycraft et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
______
JEAN CARLOS MEDINA MARTINEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
KEVIN RAYCRAFT et al.,
Respondents.
____________________________/
Case No. 1:26-cv-1389
Honorable Jane M. Beckering
OPINION
Petitioner, a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainee currently
detained at the North Lake Processing Center located in Baldwin, Lake County, Michigan, initiated
this action by filing a counseled petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
(Pet., ECF No. 1.) For the following reasons, the Court will deny Petitioner’s petition for a writ of
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice.
I. 	Procedural History
In Petitioner’s § 2241 petition, Petitioner challenges the constitutionality of his current
detention following an order issued by the Detroit Immigration Court denying him bond, and asks
the Court to, inter alia, assume jurisdiction over this matter and issue a writ of habeas corpus
ordering Respondents to release Petitioner, or, in the alternative, to promptly provide him with a
constitutionally adequate bond hearing at which Respondents bear the burden of proof by clear
and convincing evidence that Petitioner is a flight risk or danger to the community. (Pet., ECF
No. 1, PageID.25.)
Case 1:26-cv-01389-JMB-MV ECF No. 7, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/09/26 Page 1
of 3

2
In an Order entered on April 30, 2026, the Court directed Respondents to show cause,
within three business days, why the writ of habeas corpus and other relief requested by Petitioner
should not be granted. (Order, ECF No. 4.) Respondents filed their response and a recording of the
March 12, 2026, bond hearing on May 1, 2026. (Resp., ECF No. 5; Recording of Mar. 12, 2026,
Bond Hearing, filed on May 1, 2026.) Petitioner filed his reply on May 6, 2026, (ECF No. 6).
II. 	Relevant Factual Background
Petitioner is a citizen of Venezuela who entered the United States in 2023. (Pet., ECF No. 1,
PageID.6.) On January 8, 2026, ICE arrested Petitioner. (Id.)
On February 18, 2026, Petitioner filed a § 2241 petition challenging his initial detention
without a bond hearing in Medina Martinez v. Raycraft (Medina Martinez I), No. 1:26-cv-551
(W.D. Mich.). In Medina Martinez I, the Court conditionally granted Petitioner’s petition for a
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ordering Respondents to provide Petitioner
with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within five business days of the date of the Court’s
Opinion and Judgment or, in the alternative, immediately release Petitioner from custody. Op. &
J., Medina Martinez I, (W.D. Mich. Mar. 6, 2026), (ECF Nos. 6, 7.).
On March 12, 2026, Petitioner received a bond hearing pursuant to § 1226(a). (Pet., ECF
No. 1, PageID.4; Order Immigration Judge, ECF No. 1-1, PageID.30.) On that same day, the
immigration judge issued an order denying bond. (Order Immigration Judge, ECF No. 1-1,
PageID.30.) The Order of the Immigration Judge states:
Denied because[:]
Flight risk.
(Id.)
Case 1:26-cv-01389-JMB-MV ECF No. 7, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/09/26 Page 2
of 3

3
III. 	Discussion
In Petitioner’s § 2241 petition, Petitioner argues that the Immigration Judge did not apply
the constitutionally required burden of proof at Petitioner’s § 1226(a) bond hearing on March 12,
2026. Specifically, Petitioner argues that the Immigration Judge failed to require the government
to demonstrate dangerousness or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence. See Soto-Medina v.
Lynch, No. 1:25-cv-1704, --- F. Supp. 3d ----, 2026 WL 161002, at *2 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 21, 2026)
(addressing the constitutionally required burden of proof).
Based on the record before the Court at this time, including the recording of the § 1226(a)
bond hearing, there is no indication in the record that the Immigration Judge applied a
constitutionally deficient burden of proof. Under these circumstances, the Court will deny
Petitioner’s § 2241 petition without prejudice.
Conclusion
For the reasons discussed above, the Court will enter a Judgment denying Petitioner’s
petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 without prejudice.
Dated: 	June 9, 2026 	/s/ Jane M. Beckering
Jane M. Beckering
United States District Judge
Case 1:26-cv-01389-JMB-MV ECF No. 7, PageID.<pageID> Filed 06/09/26 Page 3
of 3