Mauro Bey v. Santander Consumer USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SAMEER SIRAJ MAURO BEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA, INC., et
al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
Case No. 1:25-cv-1537
HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit by filing a complaint on November 24, 2025. Plaintiff filed
an amended complaint on December 15, 2025. On January 28, 2026, the Magistrate Judge issued
a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the action be dismissed upon initial screening
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 	The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the
parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 9) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for the reasons stated
in the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for the same reasons the Court concludes that
Plaintiff’s claims are properly dismissed, the Court also concludes that any issue Plaintiff might
raise on appeal would be frivolous. 	Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962).
Accordingly, the Court certifies that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
Case 1:25-cv-01537-PLM-PJG ECF No. 10, PageID.<pageID> Filed 02/23/26 Page 1
of 2

2
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: 	February 23, 2026 	/s/ Paul L. Maloney
Paul L. Maloney
United States District Judge
Case 1:25-cv-01537-PLM-PJG ECF No. 10, PageID.<pageID> Filed 02/23/26 Page 2
of 2