Lopez III v. Trans Union LLC et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SOTERO MONTELLANO
LOPEZ III,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRANS UNION LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 25-12733
Honorable Matthew F. Leitman
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECUSAL
(ECF NO. 31)
Defendants Trans Union LLC and Experian Information Solutions,
Inc. removed this action from Wayne County Circuit Court under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1441 and 1446, claiming subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1331. 	ECF No. 1, PageID.2, 79. The Honorable Matthew F. Leitman
referred the case to the undersigned for all pretrial matters under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1). ECF No. 8. Plaintiff Sotero Montellano Lopez III moves for
Judge Stafford to recuse herself under 28 U.S.C. § 455. ECF No. 31.
Lopez’s motion for recusal lacks merit. A judge is presumed to be
impartial, and a party moving for recusal bears the burden of showing that
the judge should be disqualified. 	Scott v. Metro Health Corp., 234 F. App’x
Case 2:25-cv-12733-MFL-EAS ECF No. 32, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/24/25 Page 1 of 4

2
341, 352 (6th Cir. 2001); Burley v. Gagacki, 834 F.3d 606, 616 (6th Cir.
2016). To sustain that burden, a party alleging bias or prejudice must file
“a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is
pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of
any adverse party.” U.S.C. § 144.
Recusal is an objective standard and is not based on the subjective
viewpoint of the party. 	Wheeler v. Southland Corp., 875 F.2d 1246, 1251
(6th Cir. 1989). Disqualification is required “[w]here [a Judge] has a
personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of
disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 455(b)(1). A judge is not disqualified when the alleged bias emanates
from the proceeding themselves. 	Wheeler, 875 F.2d at 1252. Thus, the
“critical test is whether the alleged bias ‘stem[s] from an extrajudicial source
and result[s] in an opinion on the merits on some basis other than what the
judge learned from his participation in the case.’” 	Id. (quoting United States
v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 (1965)).
Lopez argues that the Court is biased because it adopted allegedly
offensive descriptions of his filings contained in Trans Union’s filings,
misapplied the law, did not accord Lopez adequate latitude as a pro se
litigant, and adopted a hostile tone in warning Lopez that he may face
Case 2:25-cv-12733-MFL-EAS ECF No. 32, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/24/25 Page 2 of 4

3
sanctions if he filed more frivolous motions. ECF No. 31, PageID.386, 387-
388, 414-415. The Court did not “adopt” Trans Union’s characterizations of
Lopez’s filings but merely repeated them in analyzing the merits of Lopez’s
motion to strike those statements. ECF No. 30, PageID.382-383. Lopez’s
remaining allegations voice his disagreement with the Court’s orders and
thus emanate from the proceedings themselves and do not support
recusal. 	See Wheeler, 875 F.2d at 1252.
The Court thus DENIES Lopez’s motion for recusal.
s/Elizabeth A. Stafford
ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD
Dated: October 24, 2025 	United States Magistrate Judge
NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file
objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The
district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous
or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. 	“When an objection is filed to a
magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling
remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the
magistrate judge or a district judge.” 	E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case 2:25-cv-12733-MFL-EAS ECF No. 32, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/24/25 Page 3 of 4

4
The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel
of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to
their email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of
Electronic Filing on October 24, 2025.
s/Davon Allen
DAVON ALLEN
Case Manager
Case 2:25-cv-12733-MFL-EAS ECF No. 32, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/24/25 Page 4 of 4