USA v. SOUTHARD et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
KRISTALYN TALMER,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Docket no. 2:20-cr-00084-GZS
2:21-cr-00004-GZS
2:22-cv-00104-GZS
2:23-cv-00110-GZS
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDED DECISION
On October 30, 2023, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 167 in 2:20-cr-84 & ECF No. 45 in 2:21-cr-4). No objections
have been filed.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. 	The Recommended Decision (ECF No. 167/45) is hereby ADOPTED.
2. 	An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section
2255 cases.
3. 	Petitioner’s Amended Motion for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No.
155/35) is hereby DENIED.
A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255
Cases is hereby DENIED because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
/s/ George Z. Singal
United States District Judge
Dated this 14th day of November, 2023.
Case 2:20-cr-00084-JAW Document 168 Filed 11/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>