USA v. SANS et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Maine
PAUL SANS,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:12-cr-00030-GZS
2:14-cv-00062 GZS
ORDER AFFIRMING THE
RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on March 11, 2015, his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 146). Petitioner filed his Objection to the Recommended
Decision (ECF No. 151) on May 26, 2015.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together
with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the
Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United
States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine
that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
is hereby AFFIRMED.
Case 2:12-cr-00030-JAW Document 152 Filed 06/17/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2. It is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C.
§2255 is DENIED;
3. It is hereby ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of
the Rules Governing Section 2255 is DENIED because there is no substantial
showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
2253(c)(2). .
/s/George Z. Singal_____________
U.S. District Judge
Dated this 17th day of June, 2015.
Case 2:12-cr-00030-JAW Document 152 Filed 06/17/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>