Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. v. Depippo

1:25-cv-10708Mad19 nov 2025

Testo completo

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 16 of 16

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 1 of 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE
EQUITIES, INC., Case No. 1:25-cv-10708-RGS

Plaintiff,

WILLIAM DEPIPPO,
Defendant.

PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Plaintiff Alexandria Real Estate
Equities, Inc. (“Alexandria,” “ARE,” or the “Company”) and Defendant William DePippo

(“DePippo”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to

enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (“Stipulated Protective Order” or “Order”):

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
confidential, proprietary, personal, trade secret, and/or commercially sensitive information for
which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than litigating
this Action may be warranted. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket
protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from
public’ disclosure ‘and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to

confidential treatment under thé applicable legal principles.

AUTHENTICATED 7
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION
GPO

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 2 of 16

2. DEFINITIONS

24 Action: The above-captioned action titled Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. v.
DePippo, Case No. 1:25-cv-10708-RGS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts, including any appeal thereof.

2.2 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
information or items under this Order,

2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” information: Non-public product, business, customer,
employee, financial, marketing, pricing, sales, personal, proprietary, or technical information, the
disclosure of which the Producing Party believes, in good faith, may risk harm to an individual or
to the business or the competitive position of the Producing Party.

2.4 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel, as
well as their respective support staff.

2.5 Designating Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces and designates Litigation
Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY.”

2.6 Litigation Material: All items or information, regardless of the medium or manner
in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony,
transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to
discovery in this Action.

2.7 ° Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent
to this Action who (1) has been retained by a Party or its Counsel to serve as an expert witness or
as a consultant in this Action; (2) is not a current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor in
the real estate industry; and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee

of a Party or of a Party’s competitor in the real estate industry.

2

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 3of 16

2.8 Final Disposition: The later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this
Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and
exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time
limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.

2.9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information:

Sensitive non-public information, including trade secrets, the disclosure of which to another Party
or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm to the Producing Party.

2.10 In-House Counsel: Attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. In-

House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.11 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity not named as a Party.

2.12 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party but are

retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or
are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party.

2.13 Party: Any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
consultants, and retained experts (and their respective support staffs).

2.14 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Litigation Material in this
Action.

2.15 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide contract document review

or other litigation support services (¢.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits
or demonstrations; and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) who are
subject to confidentiality obligations to the Receiving Party consistent with those set forth in this

Order, including their employees and subcontractors.

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 4of16

2.16 Protected Material: Any Litigation Material that is designated as

“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
2.17 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Litigation Material from a Producing Party.

3. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only Protected
Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected
Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any
testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected
Material.

However, the protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information:
(a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or
becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication
not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial
or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or
obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information
lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party.

Any use of Protected Material at trial of this Action shall be governed by a separate

agreement or ordez,
4. | DURATION

Even after Final Disposition of this Action, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this
Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order

otherwise directs.

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document25- Filed 11/19/25 Page5of 16

5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order,
or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Litigation Material that qualifies for protection under this
Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,
but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing
Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” or, as applicable, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL —
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to each document that contains Protected Material.

A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection
need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material
it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all the
material made available for inspection shall be deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL —
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof,
qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the
Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” or, as applicable, “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” legend to each document that contains
Protected Material.

(b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings,
that the Designating Party, (i) on the record at the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, or
(ii) by written notice within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the deposition transcript,
designate the whole transcript or portions of the transcript (including exhibits) as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or, as applicable, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES

5

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 6 of 16

ONLY,”. Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection
shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order.

Parties shall give the other Parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing,
or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other Parties can ensure that only
authorized individuals are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a
deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”

Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page
that the transcript contains Protected Material and indicate the appropriate designation(s). The
Designating Party shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Any transcript that is
prepared before the expiration of a 30-day period for written notice of designation shall be treated
during that period as if it had been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY” in its entirety unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the
transcript shall be treated only as actually designated.

(c) for documents produced electronically in native format, such electronic files
and documents, shall be designated for protection under this Order by the Designating Party by
including the confidentiality designation on the placeholder sheet for each file, or shall use any
other reasonable method for so designating Protected Materials produced in electronic format.
When electronic files or documents are printed for use at deposition, in a court proceeding, or for
provision in printed form to an Expert, the Party printing the electronic files or documents shall
include the confidentiality designation placeholder sheet for each file.

(d) for information produced in some form other than documentary form and

for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 7 of 16

the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend
“CONFIDENTIAL” or, as applicable, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing
Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of

protection being asserted.

(e) In the event that DePippo produces to Alexandria any of Alexandria’s own
documents or information, Alexandria shall be permitted to disclose such documents or
information to any of the categories of recipients in Paragraph 7.2, even if DePippo designated
such documents or information as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.”
Alexandria shall also have the right to designate such production (or portions thereof) as
“CONFIDENTIAL” (if produced by DePippo without a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation) or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (if produced by DePippo with a
“CONFIDENTIAL” designation or with no designation) pursuant to Paragraph 5.1. In such
circumstances, Alexandria will be deemed the Designating Party under this Order,

52 Restrictions on DePippo’s Ability to Review ARE Documents. DePippo may have

ARE documents in his possession, custody, or control, including documents in the possession of
DataMine pursuant to the Forensic Review Protocol, ECF No. 6-], that have not yet been
designated under this Order as they have not yet been produced to ARE. DePippo may not review
any such documents that he knows or should know contain ARE information (for the avoidance
of doubt, even where such documents are responsive to discovery requests from ARE). Review
of such documents shall be conducted by DePippo’s Outside Counsel of Record. However,
DePippo may review any such ARE documents that are ultimately produced in discovery, except

that any such documents designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY’S EYES

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document25- Filed 11/19/25 Page 8 of 16

ONLY” may be reviewed by DePippo solely in compliance with the procedures set forth in

Paragraph 7.3(b) below.

5.3. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. An inadvertent failure to designate qualified

information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure
protection under this Order for such material. Upon correction of a designation, and until any
challenge to a corrected designation is decided, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts
to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order,

54 Designation of Entire Documents. If any page of a document produced in response
to discovery requests contains Protected Material, the Producing Party may designate the entire
document for protection hereunder,

5.5 Withdrawal of Designations. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that

information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating

Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of

confidentiality at any time. Any such challenge shall comply with Sections 6.2 and 6.3 herein. A
Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a
challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed.

6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis
for each challenge. The Parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must
begin the process by conferring directly (in voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of communication
are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging

Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and

8

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 9 of 16

must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider
the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen
designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if
it has engaged in this meet-and-confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is
unwilling to participate in the meet-and-confer process in a timely manner,

63 Judicial Intervention. [Disputed Provision — Please see parties’ respective
proposals in Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed Protective Order].

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating
Party. During the pendency of any challenge, all Parties shall continue to afford the material in
question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until

the Court rules on the challenge.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed
or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action only for
prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such Protected Material may be
disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. Upon
Final Disposition, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 13 below.

Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in
a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Ordez,

12 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered

by the Court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any

Protected Material designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 10 of 16

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as
Professional Vendors of the Receiving Party to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the
information for this Action;

(b) the Receiving Party itself, including officers, directors, and employees
(including In-House Counsel), if any, to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation
and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure
is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(d) the Court and its personnel, including any Court reporter or videographer
transcribing or recording testimony, whether at a deposition, hearing or trial;

(e) any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, subject
to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this Stipulated
Protective Order, and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
(Exhibit A);

(f) professional jury or trial consultants, and mock jurors to whom disclosure
is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(g) during their depositions, witnesses in the Action to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary and who, prior to or at the beginning of the deposition, have signed the
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the

Designating Party or ordered by the Court; and

10

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document25_ Filed 11/19/25 Page 11 of 16

(h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

73. Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”

Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the

Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Counsel (including In-House Counsel who have
signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A)), as well as Professional
Vendors of the Receiving Party to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for
this Action;

(b) in the case of Alexandria information that is so designated (whether it is
designated (1) by Alexandria, or (2) by Mr. DePippo, to the extent Mr. DePippo produces such
information—which Mr. DePippo’s Outside Counsel of Record believes to be reasonably
necessary to discuss with Mr. DePippo for purposes of this litigation—to William DePippo,
provided that (1) he shall not use, disclose, or discuss the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL —
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information with anyone or for any purpose except with his
Outside Counsel of Record for purposes of this litigation, (2) he shall review “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information only in the immediate presence
of his Outside Counsel of Record, and (3) he shall not retain any copies (digital or hard copy) of
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information;

(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party (1) to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the “Acknowledgment

1]

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 12 of 16

and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in Section
7.4 have been followed;

(d) the Court and its personnel, including any Court reporter or videographer
transcribing or recording testimony, whether at a deposition, hearing, or trial;

(e) any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, subject
to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this Stipulated
Protective Order, and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
(Exhibit A);

(f) professional jury or trial consultants, and mock jurors to whom disclosure
is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and
Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);

(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

(h) [Disputed Provision — Please see parties’ respective proposals in Joint
Motion for Entry of Proposed Protective Order].

7.4. [Disputed Provision — Please see parties’ respective proposals in Joint Motion for
Entry of Proposed Protective Order].

7.5 Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective
Order shall be construed to prevent Counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case
based in whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided Counsel does not disclose the

Protected Material itself except as provided in this Order,

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER
LITIGATION

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels

12

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 13 of 16

disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” that Party must:

(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is
subject to this Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order;
and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by
the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena
or court order shall not produce any information designated in this Action before a determination
by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the
Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of
seeking protection in that court of its confidential material — and nothing in these provisions should
be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful

directive from another court.

9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS
LITIGATION

The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this
action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this Action is
protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should

be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protection.

13

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 14 of 16

10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected
Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective
Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the
unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected
Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the
terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and

Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

11. PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain Litigation Material
is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are
those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b\(5)(B). The production of privileged or
work-product protected documents, ESI, or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not
a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state
proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal
Rule of Evidence 502(d). Subject to Section 5.2 above concerning certain restrictions on
DePippo’s review of ARE documents, nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to
limit a Party’s right to conduct a review of documents, ESI, or information (including metadata)
for relevance, responsiveness, and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before

production. The provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) do not apply.

12. MISCELLANEOUS

12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to

seek its modification by the Court in the future.

14

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document25_ Filed 11/19/25 Page 15 of 16

12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections, By stipulating to the entry of this Order, no Party
waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or
item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives
any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this
Protective Order,

12.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating Party
or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in
the public record in this Action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any
Protected Material must comply with Local Rule 7.2. Protected Material may only be filed under
seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue.
These procedures for filing Protected Material with the Court shall apply only to pretrial
proceedings. If necessary, the Parties shall propose to the Court procedures for the filing of

Protected Material with regard to trial.

13. FINAL DISPOSITION

Within sixty (60) days after the Final Disposition of this Action, each Receiving Party must
return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this
subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and
any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected
Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the
Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60-day
deadline that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations,
summaries, or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material.
Notwithstanding this provision, Outside Counsel of Record are entitled to retain any copies of their
own data that is produced in discovery or received through forensic analysis and any archival copy

15

Case 1:25-cv-10708-RGS Document 25 Filed 11/19/25 Page 16 of 16

of all pleadings; motion papers; deposition, hearing, and trial transcripts; legal memoranda;
correspondence; deposition, hearing, and trial exhibits; Expert reports; attorney work product; and
Expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies

that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in

Paragraph 4.

SO ORDERED:

Dated: li 19° 2S

The}Honorable Richard G. Stearns
United States District Judge

16

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.