Arrington et al v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
CHARMAINE ARRINGTON, et al. 	CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS 	NO. 25-1505
DAMIEN AUSTIN 	SECTION M (3)
ORDER
Having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the magistrate judge’s
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”),1 and the failure of any party to file an objection to the
R&R, the Court hereby approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. 	Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
because plaintiff failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, thereby depriving the Court of
subject-matter jurisdiction over such claim and any basis for supplemental jurisdiction over
plaintiff’s state-law claims.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 20th day of November, 2025.
_________________________________
BARRY W. ASHE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 R. Doc. 12.
Case 2:25-cv-01505-BWA Document 13 Filed 11/20/25 Page 1 of 1