IN RE: Osborne Precious Metals Company Precious Metals Investments Securities Litigation

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case MDL No. 935 Document 15 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1of1

DOCKET NO. 935
SEP -2 92
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT. LITIGATION

CLERK C2 SE PART
IN RE OSBORNE PRECIOUS METALS COMPANY PRECIOUS
METALS INVESTMENTS SECURITIES LITIGATION

BEFORE JOHN F. NANGLE, CHAIRMAN, S. HUGH DILLIN,”
MILTON POLLACK, LOUIS H. POLLAK, ROBERT R. MERHIGE, JR.,
AND WILLIAM B. ENRIGHT, JUDGES OF THE PANEL

Dorothy Svets, et al. v. Osborne Precious Metals Co., Inc., et al.,
N.D. California, C.A. No: 3:92-0357

Gilbert V. Lynd v. Osborne Precious Metals Co., etc., et al.,
C.D. California, C.A. No. 2:92-1752

ORDER DEEMING MOTION MOOT

This matter is before the Panel on motion of plaintiff in the Central California action to
transfer, pursuant to.28 U.S.C. §1407, the action pending in the Northern District of California
to the Central District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the
action pending there. Several defendants agree that centralization is appropriate, but prefer
transfer for all purposes under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a).

_ In light of the Panel’s order in In re Precious Metals Securities Litigation, MDL-941
(J.P.M.L. 1992) which centralizes the two actions in MDL-935 along with several other related
actions in the Central District of California, we find that this Section 1407 action is now moot.

_IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Section 1407 motion in the above-captioned
litigation is DEEMED MOOT.

FOR THE PANEL:

John F. Nang]
Chairman

* Judge Dillin took no part in the decision of this matter.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO