1:82-F-00529•IN RE: Dayco Corporation Foreign Sales Orders Litigation
Testo completo
rere ———————————eret———EEE TT TER j Case MDL No. 529 Document 2 Filed 06/01/15 Page 1 of 2 ; Min Sry 24y,,-. . REE . EP aT . : EE r= St f Lf Rye 5 B re i Ea vA OE . _ Paro. i . A Lip CA ERK CES ean i. DOCKET NO. 529 ie “300 : , BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Po IN RE DAYCO CORPORATION FOREIGN SALES ORDERS LITIGATION ORDER DENYING TRANSFER%* . Co This litigation consists of six actions pending in : BE two districts as follows: four actions in the Southern : District of Ohio and two actions in the Southern District cL } . of New York. Presently before the Panel isa motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407, to centralize the litigation in the Southern District of New York. The motion is brought by plaintiff Richard Purcell, and is not supported by any other party. Fe On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing held, [ER movant has not persuaded us, in the face of no support from : responding parties, that Section 1407 transfer would serve a the convenience of the parties and witnesses and further } : the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. Moreover, we note that various parties in this docket have represented that alternatives to Section 1407 transfer, such as arrangements for counsel in the Ohio actions to attend all New York depositions, have already been utilized. Whatever need that might have existed for centralization under Section 1407 is thus diminished. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. FOR THE PANEL: oo 4 \ _~ 7 | ft CL. “ip Andrew A. Caffrey Chairman * Judge Edward S. Northrop took no part in the decision : of this matter.
A ; | | = : Case MDL No. 529 Document 2 Filed 06/01/15 Page 2 of 2 SCHEDULE A MDL-529 -- In re Dayco Corporation Foreign Sales Orders Litigation Southern District of Ohio Robert Heist v. Richard J. Jacob, et al., C.A. No. C-3-82-184 Allen Efros, etc. v. Richard J. Jacob, et al., C.A. No. C-3-82-254 S.C. Blumberg v. Richard J. Jacob, et al., C.A. No. C-3-82-329 Richard F. Purcell v. Richard J. Jacob, et al., C.A. No. C-3-82-405 Southern District of New York Dayco Corp. v. Foreign Transactions Corp., et al., C.A. No. 82 Civ 3354 Richard F. Purcell v. Foreign Transactions Corp., et al., C.A. No. 82 Civ 4817 4
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.