IN RE: Vuitton Trademark Litigation

Case MDL No. 377 Document 2 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 4 :
| DOCKET NO. 377 RC ETI SE5 NA Co
Ci, ley,BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: LD, —& oo
4s i.
: Sly i
IN RE VUITTON TRADEMARK LITIGATION . Re Bn
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE S00
In the actions listed on the attached Schedule A none ]
of the parties responding to the Panel's order to show oT
cause favors transfer of these actions to a single district EE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 for coordinated or consolidated Ce
pretrial proceedings. Upon consideration of the papers Co
submitted and the hearing held, the Panel finds that these :
actions involve minimal common questions of fact and that
transfer of these actions to a single district pursuant to
Section 1407 would not necessarily serve the convenience : .
of the parties and witnesses or promote the just and :
efficient conduct	of the actions. oo - EE
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the order to show cause ’ a.
regarding the actions listed on the attached Schedule A B
be, and the same hereby is, VACATED. -
7 THE PANELS no7 i Ee: 2	77 RT Br al :
FLYJIJli i
Murray I. Gurfein
Chairman ~

7 ~ Case MDL No. 377 Document 2 Filed 05/18/}5,.Page 20f 4
CHORE oo
: ThE TT A
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIZATION — a	RA ITR: :
IN RE VUITTON TRADEMARK LITIGATION PATRICIA: pow 05	CLERK GF Theis 4be LoORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BE
You and each of you are hereby ORDERED to show cause :
why the actions listed on the attached Schedule A should
not be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407 to a single i
district for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. - EE
Responses to this order shall conform with the 8 Co
"requirements of Rule 8, of the Rules of Procedure of the EET
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 78 F.R.D. 561 a
(1978) . oo |
You are further notified that the issuing of this order
by the Panel does not affect or suspend orders and discovery
proceedings in the district courts in which said
multidistrict litigation is pending. RPJIPML (Rule 16). :
: FOR THE PANEL:
~7 / Co	oe : ~ 7 oy ; } :
: MuFray I. Gurfein
Chairman LL

rea
- Case MDL No. 377 Doom is-£iled 05/18/15 Page	3 of 4
® MDL-377 ~- In re Vuitton Trademark LitigationCentral District of California
Vuitton	Ft Fils S.A. Vv. Shirt-N-Tlie Corp., et al.,
"CJA No. CV78-4Z386-IH
Vuitton ET Fils S.A. v. French Connection, Inc.,
C.A. No. CV73-4737-TH
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. The Kaitz Corp.,
C.A. No. CV78-473838=TH
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Host International, Inc.,
C.A. No. CV79=0367<TH
Northern District of California
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Robert A. Frankel Jewelers,
Inc., C.A. No. C/9-0541=CFD
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Ni Kai Do, C.A. No. C79-0542-LHB
Southern District of Florida
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Corner Boutique,
C.A. No. 78=495T=Civ=JaC
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Newton Enter rises, Inc.,
d/b/a Dorothy s, C.A. No. EFI kT
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Thelma Erlichstein d/b/a
: Fashionettes of Miami, C.A. No. 78=5T08=Civ=JAG
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Ira Rosenfeld
d/b/a Ira Rosenfeld, C.A. No. 78-5068~-Civ-JAG
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Miami International
Merchandise Mart, d/b/a Miami Merchandise Mart,C.A. No. 78=5199-Civ—JAG
District of New Jersey .
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Susan Greene, Inc.,CA. Vo. 7827583
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Interiors by Lorette,C.A. No. 7920510
Eastern District of New York
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Purse Strings,
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Handbags & Accessories,C.A. No. 78=71%4%
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Claire's Bouti ue,
C.A. No. 78=71%45
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Arthur Mall,
C.A. No. 78=71%¢6 ’
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Lawrence Mahl,
C.A. No. 78=71%7
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Stewart J. Brill,
: C.A. No. 78-2150
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Trudy Kramer,
C.A. No. 78-7431
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Robert F. Glicken,C.A. No. 78-7313
® Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Aeroplane Luggage Co.,	JA. No. -
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Jet Handbags, Inc.,et al.,C.A. No. 79-43
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Bemar Euro-Imports Inc.,et al. C/A. No. 79-287 TT

SOR Case MDL No. 377 Document2 Filéd 05/18/15 Page	4 of 4
® Schedule A -- P.2
Southern District of New York
Vuitton	Et Fils S.A. v. Alexander Kapusta d/b/a
La Femme, C.A. NO. 78 Civ 5007
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Virginia Loving, Inc.,
C.A. No. 78 Civ 5003
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Valo Importing	and
Merchandising Corp., ect al., C.A. No. 78 Civ 5247
Vuitton EE Fils S.A. v. Adaptive Merchandising
Corp., et al., C.A. No. 78 Civ 57Z3
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Helou Fashion Ba s, Inc.
C.A. No. 78 Civ 5697
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Karen Bags, Inc., et al.,C.A. No. 78 Civ 58563
Vuitton Et Fils v. Goodoo Inc.,
C.A. No. 78 Civ 591% :
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. F.M. Handbags & Shoes,
CA. No. 78 Civ 5919
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Korliss Fashions Inc., et
al. C.A. No. 78 Civ 3970 )
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Fabric Service Bureau,
C C.A. No. 79 Civ 717Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Dame Belt & Ba Co., Inc.,et al., C.A. No. 79 Civ 767
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Salomon Mizrahi d/b/a
Perla Handbags, C.A. No. 79 Civ 7583
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Dubette Bags,
C.A No. 79 Civ 307
Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. Ba City, et al., -
CAT No. 79 Civ 631
District of Virgin Islands
Vuitton EE Fils S.A v Saari s Inc., d/b/a
Sparky's Gift Shop, C.A. No. 78-345