IN RE: IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust Litigation

. 1.70
“% Za
BER
52
ed _
Solel. —
Date Q ” -
2/77 ==] MOTION of IBM for consolidation of actions A-1 thru A-7 for pretrial	5 proceeding nde ecton 1407.	Supporting	brief and cerfificate
[—— Q ervice attached.|] quest	for extension of time to file response
4 = California Computer Products, Inc., Centrury Data Systems, Inc.,| and Hudson General Corporation request	for extensionof time to
respond to motion a
] 4 |¥ ORDER - extending time to ALL to and including Feb. 19, 1974 to
file and serve responses to motion. _
1/16/74 — MEMOREX CORP., MRX Salég and Service Corp. Peripherals Leasing	: ! CORP. AND MEMOREX A.B. SWEDEN request for extension to Feb. 19, 1974
1/18/74 §1 SRANSAMERE CA GORE. request for extension Of time to Feb. 19, II742/78 RF résponse	to motion w/cert. ofservice	TT5774} - CATTFORNIA	COMPUTER PRODUCTS AND ENTURY DATA SY 1S AND HUDSON
[ GENERAL CORP. response	to motion w/cert. of service.
2/19/74 i TLC PERIPHERALS LEASING response to motion W/Cert.	Of service ——
2/39/74 | i TRANSAMERICA COMPUTER CO. IE€SpPONSE to motion w/eert of service —
g 3 HOWARD . EVIN AND LEVIN COMPUTER CORP sgponse to motiol n =alt oS
of service. TT
2/26/74 | | HEARING ORDER ~- Setting A-1 through KB A-7 for hearing, March, , 1974
i Denver, Colorado oo
2727772 7 IBM reply brief, w/cert. of service _°
"5/13/74 1 | CONSENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CARTER FOR JUDGE MCNICHOLS (from the p.Idaho) —
F i to handle litigation in the N.D. California pursuant ty !
TE 28 U.S.C. §1407 : —
74 OPINION AND ORDER transferring actions pending in & C.D. C3 O =
RN to the N.D. california for coordinated or consolidated Pretris	proceedings before Judge McNichols pursiant to 28 U.S.C. SI407
- : F.a MOTION AND BRIEF —-- IBM to add two additional actions for transfer
I - to the N..D. California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407	-_ EE complaints-attached
| oc | RESPONSE, BRIEF IN SUPPORT-- Sanders Associates, Inc. w/cert. of service
s/zs75 |} memory Technology, inc. v. IBM, D. Mass, 74-50518
: Sanders Assoc., Inc., et al. v. IBM, D. N.H., C74-14_
i | HEARING ORDER ~-- March 21, 1975, Dallas, Texas
: E Notified counsel, involved judges
3/10/17 Letter from counsel for Memory Technology stating no objection to
3/10/75 410§ REP BR ==IBM to Sanders Associate Response w/cert/ cf service
3/17/75) } ORDER == correcting hearing order of 3/5/75 to read N. D. Calif.
l __§ ~~ Notified counsel!
MEMOR HNOLO N [BM, D. MAS 4-5051-8
ANDERS ASSO BM, D H -75=14 I
8 OPINION AND ORDER ansferring actions to the N.D. California
— or coordinated or	consolidatedpretrial proceedings pursuant
I - 0 8 §140
8/21/75 1 LETTER -- From J. McNichols to J. Murrah stating action 1s ready
: for remand SANDERS V. IBM TTT
8/21/75 |__| LETTER —- From counsel for IBM EXKAKXKgto J. McNichols stating
—] Opposition to remand of SANDERS V. IBM NB	8/21/75 | | SHOW CAUBL ORDER -- SANDERS V. IBM why action should	not be remanded
it to D. New Hampshire Butmecoominmetiilr-aleaaneslismned
I pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. Notified counsel
I Notifed fudge
|9/2/76	| | HEARING ORDER -- Setting Sanders v. IBM for hearing 9/26/76
Los Ange8es, Calif,

Be |	Jan I B h
Date I 2 Ce fromoIBM
0 I 4REQUEST FOF EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TQ SHOW CAUSE. QRDER.==tO
4&4 and including september 24, 1975 ==DENTED oe
9/8/75 4 _ARESPONSE_=- CALIFORNIA PLAINTIFFS _w/cert	of Service... oe
9/8/75 12 ERESPON —-_SANDERS ASSOCIATES,	INC.W.Cert.	of service... .. co	|
9/8/75 3 —4 RESPONSE... == IBM.w/cert.	of Service ee
—9/15/ 414 § REPLY -- IBM w/cert., of service
-9/15/ §. 15 | REPLY —--_ Sanders Assoc. w/cert of service |
9/26/75 § _!FILED IN OPEN COURT -- Transcript of oral Argument on IBM's Argument
: 3 ________.. ._ to Withdraw Suggestion of Remand
9/26/75 | Jen some som = 4ORDER re: IBMs Motion to Withdraw Remand |	1/22/76 § 2 OPINION	AND ORDER == REMANDING SANDERS ASSQC,, INC., V. IBM. N.D.	.____
— In8 CALIF, Civil ActionNo. C74-1449-RM --Remanding action to ____ben Bd Dl. New	HampshiXe er eer	2/19/76 £16 _§ MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF DEPOSITION JUDGE -- California Computer =.
58 8 _w/cert.	of ser®wice ee
4v21/76 4 _§ OPINION	AND ORDER RE: JudgeMcNichols-as-deposition Judge inS.D.N.Y.
—f ein this litigation	:7T Clarifing transferee	4	Judges to conduct depositions pursuant to
- kh.	28U.S.C. §1407 in any district.
11/3/76 § . _§ STIPULATION FOR REMAND == California Computer Products, IRC.
——— +ere	CON ENYY Data Systems	SUSSSOUUNSRUINE SUSNSSVUSS :FOSS	SHV SRIBM	Approved by J. McNichols ee
1/3/76 { __ SORDER -= REMANDING == (A=1) Calif. Computer Products,et al. wv. IBM
-— &8 tothe C.D. California == Notified counsel, involved judges
- 8 4. involved clevks ee —————————
EE i
-
EE SOS HP

0&0, 5/13/74 C475F. subse BIA. 163 Document1 Filed 04/30/15 Page	3 of 6 ro
DOCKET NO. 163 -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION A0&0 5/5/75 \ F. SUPP. #2 Q@/L ENA
—— ~~	os N77) Tl a ee TT rT
oo T1087 Fo oUPD AT # Description of Litigation : ay
ed) Y (IA /, A a 9 P
IN RE IBM PERIPHERAI EEDP DEVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
i Co Summary of Pancl Action )
. Date(s) of Hearing (s)\ s2/74 : oo
Date(s) of Opinion(s) or Order(s) 5/13/74
Consolidation Ordered XXX Name of Transferee Judge RAY MCNICHOL | / A Ia
Consolidation Denied Transferee District N.D. CALIFORNIA
Intra-| District| Civil Date ofOffice and Action Transfer! Transferee [Dismissal
Number Caption Judge Number Date Docket No. [or Remand Misc.
A-1 California Computer Products, Inc.,} C.D.Cal as V2" eld (FXBM Mot.
et al. v. IBM Corp. Tre —73=2331=R 713/74 [TN] . Sahl SI:F1=511/2/74
, ny ‘. SF	13/74 AY 1877 Sip
A-2 Hudson General Corp. v. IBM Corp. .D.Cal.{ 73-2796-F 5/13/17 DL NYS “rd nomN ) . iy
RTI
A-3 X Transamerica Computer Co., a Corp. N.D.Cal. | 83a T IE BER VINE IE EE SL a SE "v. IBM Corp. C-73-1888-WTS Co
pd Ls
A-4 . | ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. Vv. N.D.Cal. Ny ER Sa EAS (97 Jon
"| IBM Corp. C-73-2238-3Q Reis ’ a {- Es
A-5 X Memorex Corp., et al. v. IBM Corp. | N.D.Cal} C-73-2239 Sse Se Sa ¢ | Tag " "
A-6 Memorex A.B. (Sweden), et al. v. oon NT A B /-do n
| IBM Corp. | orem ACY Lr	— R007A-7 | Marshall Industri c ¥.0.cal.| SN
- arsha ndustries, a Corp. V. .D.Cal. ea E TT 5 oe n n	| IBM Corp. | C=73-3043 MF —y - 75*
XYz- orro Pzecision Inc. ¥. l.N.M. LD. CT74TI65 — ;
i /
| -74-1920 [io y
XY7-2 | DPF INC. V. IBM oe - 7 : | oo 2/5 YD

Case MDL No. 163 Document1 --Filed 04/30/15 Page 4 of 6 |
DOCKET NO. / 7 (CONTINUED) PAGE
Intra-] TT District{ Civil "Date of
Office and Action Transfer| Transferee| Dismissal
Number Caption | Judge| Number|Date |Docket No.jor Remand Misc.
B-1 Howard S. Levin v. IBM D.N.J. 1173-72 NOT RELATED===--=f————————-
B-2 Mira Pac Inc. v. IBM S.D.Tex |73-H-677 -4~====we=+t—-==NOT RELATED -====f=-c—eee---
B-3 Symbolic Control, Inc. v. IBM N.D.Cal {C71-2207-AJZ ------1+~-NOT RELATED~---———f————————
c-1 Memory Technology, Inc. Vv. D. Mass |74-5051-S s/s - IEC F3 3/29/76 IBM MotionIBM Skinner / 2/18/75
” A — TT
. 7-75~7777 A Loaf
c-2 Sanders Associates, Inc., et al. v{D. N.H. [C75-14 Th Az vaca pry. ; \
IBM Wl A. 3/275 Lf 23 2 Pp	— er BOUnes i TT em
Jet (fee ZO LEE PERE Sa Sigg fT SO	SN fs RU ) a: AN IA
7 “ or Vs/ + . i Lo /J
Id / Le i Coz - ‘ ' i | / he ,
( 2) / Ae | /) A Leg	- , d 7° .
eu I . = )
rs II AS
heiy NPS
/ 7 3 pled re )	Ne art Toy { 2
Cees nr ES
op <, sTS & pa 308m. [2 tan [vif A rp tg/ er yo tse 2 R } | | KEa.
Locktt 5 PA || ! NY
yd5vd | | CA; i ee h DES -~
| | 0 2 TU !i | < Se 2 AL FE it A cA ii : ; — lS ’ . : '
| = Lt SN : i
| | == tr. =| => \ J om —=\ es ref ref |

| P. _1
ATTORNEY SERVICE LIST
JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
® DOCKET NO. 163 -- IN RE IBM PERIPHERAL EDP DEVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff Defendant
CALIFORNIA COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC., * INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
ET AL. (A-1) O'Melveny & Myers
HUDSON GENERAL CORP. (A-2) 611 West Sixth Street
Maxwell M. Blecher, Esquire Los Angeles, California 90017
® Blecher, Collins & Hoecker612 South Flower St., Suite 1250
Los Angeles, California 90017
TRANSAMERICA COMPUTER CO. (A-3)
Richard J. Lucas, Esquire
Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94111
ILC PERIPHERALS LEASING CORP. (A-4) :
MEMOREX CORP., ET AL. (A-5)
MEMOREX A.B. (SWEDEN), ET AL. (A-6)
Robert D. Raven, Esquire
Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton
& Clark
One Post St., Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
MARSHALL INDUSTRIES (A-7)
John H. Brinsley, Esquire
® Adams, Duque & Hazeltine523 West Sixth Street
Los Angeles, California 90014
MEMORY TECHNOLOGY (C-1)
Terry Philip Segal, Esq.
Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault
10 Post Office Square
Boston, Mass. 02109
DERS ASSOCIATES C-2
Devine, Mill t, Stahle#™Branch
1838 Elm : jcSET
veChester, New HampshTre. 03105
~~—_——————

D. 2
Plaintiff Defendant
MIRA-PAK, INC. (B-2)
Stephen D. Susman, Esquire ®Fulbright	& Crooker
Bank of the Southwest Building :
Houston, Texas 77002
HOWARD S. LEVIN, ET AL. (B-3)
Stanley Weiss, Esquire
Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey
744 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
~~
) L al Counsel for I C-2
on 8, hos, Esy. Va
Ea CASheehan, Phin , Bass& Green
1000 En Street ~~ \Mnches er, New Hampshire 03101
Nei