IN RE: Multidistrict Litigation Resulting from the Seeburg-Commonwealth United Merger

2/2/70 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE OF HEARING - 2/27/70 in New York City. (9:30 a.m.)
2/12/70 ORDER AMENDING SCHOW CAUSE ORDER - adding B-1 to Schedule A. ¢ ’
2/16/70/ RESPONSE OF CONSOLIDATED NEW YORK ACTIONS SUPPORTING CONSO. IN N.Y., S.
2/16/70 HRESPONSE (Brief) of KLERINER BELL & CO., INC., KLEINER, BELL & CO., BURTh KLEINER, LIONELL BELL, RALPH SHAPIRO & 140 ASSOCIATES.
2/17/70 ORDER AMENDING SHOW CAUSE ORDER - adding C actions to Schedule A.
2/18/7Q X RESPONSE OF PL. STUPARITZ (consolidation in N.D. Illinois)
2/19/70 4 BRIEF OF PL. MODLIE H. SANDERS (Dela., No. 3834)*
2/19/70 Brief on Behalf of Group Stockholder Pl. of Commonwealth (Land v. Commonwealth)S.D. N.Y., No. 69 civil 3726
2/19/70 ¢, MEMO OF DEF: "COMMONWEALTH UNITED, SEEBURG CORP. OF DELA., ROZET, corpsrery, @ANSOFF, UNGER, LOEB, KALM, KIBRICK, MARTIN & BRESLAUER (supporting)
2/19/70 7 RESPONSE OF LOUIS J. NICASTRO (w/brief supporting)
2/19/70 S57 MOT ION TO TRANSFER TO ILL., N.D. FOR CONSOLIDATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS BYDEF. Delbert W. Coleman )
2/19/70 AFFIDAVIT OF COUNSEL FOR DEF. PETER HUANG oo oo
2/20/70 /¢ Ltr/request for extension of time by Pl. Albert Fried & Co.
2/20/70 Granted extension of time to & incl. 2/26/70 to pl. Albert Fried & Co.
2/20/70 ORDER AMENDING SCHOW CAUSE ORDER - adding D action to Schedule A.
*% .
2/20/70 ,/ AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY FOR DEF. Peter Gettinger.
2/24/70 /-2 REPLY BRIEF OF KLEINER BELL GROUP OF DEFENDANTS IN° OPPOSITION TO TRANSFER.
2/24/70 /3 RESPONSE OF ALBERT FRIED & CO. TO ORBER TO SHOW CAUSE.	: .
2/2/70 | £ RESPONSE OF PL. JENNINGS (Ala., N., No. 69-661 and 70-120) Supporting ae J
3)af70 /SRESPOMSE OF PL. SILVERMAN (S.D. N.Y., 69 Civ 5328)
4/23/70 Ig Filed ltr/motion to remand Sanders v. Seeburg, Dela., No. 3834
5/4/70 Filed CONSENT OF TRANSFEREE COURT signed by CJ Sugarman for assignment of
J litigation to Judge Frank H. McFadden (N.D. Ala.)
5/4/70 OPINION AND ORDER transferring actions on Schedules A (2 fr. C.D. Cal. and
1 fr. N.D. Ala.) and B-{2 fr. N.D. Ill. and 1 fr. Dela.) to the Southern
District of New York for assignment to Judge Frank H. McFadden for conso-
lidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings. per curiam.
| Certified copy to Clerk of transferee district; copies to transferor ®judges, transferee judge, cJ «transferee district; interested and involved
counsel, Panel members, transferor clerks, publishers.
a a ne a a a
, 5/22/70 Filed ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND in Sanders v. Seeburg, Dla., No. 3834.
| Copies to judges, counsel and clerks.

5/15/70 ROBERT R. JENNINGS, ETC. V. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, Inc.,
N.D. Ala., Civil Action No. CA 70-120 - ROBERT SOHN AND WALLACE WALNER
V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., ET AL, N.D. Ill., (E. Div.) , No. 70C 240
CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES -
5/25/70 Notice of Opposition in Jennings v. Merrill Lynch, etc., N.D. Ala., No. CA 70-120
5/25/70 ORDER STAYING execution of 3/25/ CTO in Jennings v. Merrill Lynch, No. 70-120 N_.D.A
5/26/70 ROBERT SOHN AND WALLACE WALNER V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORPORATION, ET AL. @®N.D. Ill. (E. Div.), Civil Action No. 70 C 240. CTO EFFECTIVE
TODAY. Notified transferee clerk and involved judges.
6/5/70 ¢ SILED Motion by Defendant Merrill Lynch to Vacate Conditional Transfer OrderN.D. Ala., No. CA 70-120
(*)
§/11/70 POLARIS FUND INC., V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORPORATION, ET AL, C.D. Calif.,
Civil Action No. 70-1228-HP. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND IN-
VOLVED JUDGES :
r ay .
6/9/70 Hearing Order - Wash., D.C., 6/26/70 - Notice of Counsel; involved judges;
hearing clerk; court reporter. C
6/23/70 POLARIS FUND INC., V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORPORATIGN, ET AL, C.D. CALIF.,
C.A. No. 70-1228-HP. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED TRANSFEREE CLERK AND
INVOLVED JUDGES
6/25/70 Response to motion of def. Merrill Lynch to vacate Panel's transfer order	by. pl.
6/29 M0 Filed Order vacating the May 15, 1970 C.T.O. in C.A. No. 70-120, N.D. Ala. :
Ce Sent to All,Counsel and involved Judges. and hearing Clerk.
9/1/70 JACK B. CRAWFORD, et al v. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., et al, C.D. Calif., )
_ No. 70-1740-R. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED JUDGES
9/14/70'7 CRAWFORD V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED, C.D. Cal., No. 70-1740-R - Notice of Oppositipn by2A Y
9/14/70 " " " " " " ~ Stay of exe aition order.
9/29/7022; Motion to Vacate by pl. in Crawford v. Commonwealth, C.D. Cal., No. 76-1740-R
9/29/70 HEARING ORDER - 10/22/70 in Boston, Mass. Copies to involved judges, hearing
clerk & court reporter.
10/12/70<, Memo of Kleiner Bell Group of Def. to Motion to Vacate CTO. (]
10/15/70<; Response of Commonwealth Unmted Class Action Pls. to Motion ofCrawford.
10/16/70< 3Memoradum of Def. Commonwealth in opposition to motion of Crawford Pls. to
vacate transfer order.
10/19/70 Memoradum of Def. Sidney Kibrick in opposition to Motion to vacate conditional
transfer order.
10/20/70 © Memorandum of Commonwealth Plaintiffs Opposing Motion in Crawford Cas.
10/22/70 Brief of Pl. Crawford in Reply. ®
10/28/70 Walden Robert Cassotto, a/k/a Bobby Darin v. Commonwealth United Corp.,	et al,
Cc.D. Ca., No. 70-1920-DWW. CTO ENTERED TODAY. SENT TO ALL COUNSEL AND INVOLVED
JUDGES.
11/13/70 WALDEN ROBERT CASSOTTO, a/k/a Bobby Darin v. Commonwealth United Corp., et al,
C.D. Ca., No. 76-1920-DWW. CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. TIE
INVOLVED "JUDGES ODAY NOTI D TRANSFEREE CLERK

- . ¥
D. C. 110 Rev. Civil Docket Continuation ee @
DATE PROCEEDINGS IdentNoted
12/14/70| MALCOLM IL. STRAUSS Vv. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., ET AL, E.D. Mo. IR
TT a ra TIRED POURY. SNE 20 ALL COUNSEL (liaise	TT ~ AND INVOLVED JUDGES. — /—/— —/—0 +7 > —//7 7 TT
12/17/70 Order Entered staying decision	on motion to vacate conditional order
of 9/1/70. Sent to Liaison Counsel	and involved Judges.
12/30/70 MALCOLM L.STRAUSS	V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORPORATION, ET AL,
) E.D. Mo. (E. Div.), No. 70C 580(2). CTO EFFECTIVE TODAY. NOTIFIED
TRANSFEREE CLERK AND JUDGES -
2/9/71 ENTERED CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER TODAY. Harry M. Popkin v.
] Seeburg Corp., C.D. Calif, Civil Action No. 70-2745F B
Sent to Counsel (Service Attorney List) and Involved Judges.
2/25/71 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER final - Harry M. Popkin	.v. The Seeburg
Corporation, C.D. Calif., Civ. Action No. 70-2745F. Sent to oo
Clerk and involved Judges.
3/10/71 ACK B RAWEF'QRD COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., C.D ALIF 70-1740-R
ORDER- lifting the stay of execution of the 9/1/70 CTO and transferring
oo D> the D., N.Y Sen o Transferee Clerk, Transferor Cler
and Involved Judges and Counsel. :
3/10 JACK B. CRAWFORD V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., C.D. CAL 0-1740-R
9/1/70 CTO effective today. Sent with order lifting stay to transferee”
: clerk ransferor clerk, involved judges..
3/12/71 RX 7|0RDER of Judge Real (C.D. Calif) denying motion of Plaintiff Jack B.
Crawford - filed 2/3/71 :
6/11/71 POWELL V.MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., C.D.CAL. 71-1228-F
CTO enterd today. Notified counsel and involved Judges.
6 4 | POWELL V. MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., C.D.CAL 71-1228-F
Y| Notice of Opposition from Defendant. Order entered staying execution
7/9/71 > PORELL V. MERRILL LYNCH ETC., C.D, Cal., No, 71-1228-F
7/9771 POWELL V. MERRILL LYNCH, ETC., c.W, ca¥,, No, 71-1228-F
Hearing Order ~ 7/30/71 in Denver. Notice to Counsel, copies of
| order to involved judges, hearing clerk and counsel
/22/7150POWELL V. MERRILL LYNCH, C.D. Cal. No. 71-1228-F -
Commonwealth United, Kleiner, Bell & Co., Inc., Burt Kleiner, Lionel Bell
and Ralph Shapiro joint brief of defendants
7/27/7195/POWELI MERRIL NCH D, CAI 0 1-1228-F
Merril! nch, Pierce ennexr & Smi n reply to Joint Brief
8/18/7154 J.E. O'DANIEL, ET AL. V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., W.D.ARK., 71-C-1
BERRY PERTROLEUM CO. V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED COPR., W.D.ARK., 70-C~-58
Motion and Brief from Commonwealth United for transfer under
28 U.S.C. §1407 to the U.S.D.C. for the S.D.N.Y. with the pending
cases in this litigation. (Certificate of Service)
8/24/7187 O\DARIEL V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED, W.D. ARK 71-C-15 = |
| BERRY PETROLEUM V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED, W.D. ARK, 70-C-58 |
ORDER ENTERED extending time to file and serve responsive brief &g
// "
(2+ : _

DATE | PROCEEDINGS Beebea
8/26/71 | O'DANTEL V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., W.D. ARK, ED-71-C-15
BERRY PETROLEUM V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED, W.D. ARK, ED-70-C-58
HEARING ORDER entered. Set for Washington, D. C. 9/24/71
oh BADEN POW § AN MAR POW MER NCH, PIER a
— td ing ay of 6 Q and ansfe ing a ion to D.N
9/14/71 34 O DANI I, V.” COMMONSEALTH UNITED CORP., W.D.ARK, ED-71-C-15
|" BERRY PETROLEUM V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED, W.D.ARK, ED-70-C-58
Response	and Brief w/certificate of service to motion to transfer.
9/22/71 Js COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP. reply brief in support of motion to transfe
9/23/71 4c BERRV-DELAWARE's Statement in susport Of motion to transfer |
- —
Prospectus o and also a reprint of Berry Petroleum -
Proxy Statement (p. 16
10/12/71 I er. response of firm of Lester & Schults to 9/30/71 ltr of Mr. Hindman.
10/20/71 | O'DANIEL, ET AL. V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP N.D. ARK D-71-C=15 —
BERRY PETROLEUM CO. V. COMMONWEALTH UNITED CORP., ET A N.D.ARK N-78~-C=58
| ____OPINION AND ORDER denying defendants motion to transfer uner 28 U.S.C. §1407
qd Show Cause @rder. Notified counsel and involved judges, |
2/22/7837 ® Attorney for Berry Petroleum request for hearing .
2/22/73{§Berry Petroleum Co. response to show cause order w/cert. of service]
26 A VAR N esponse 0 0 approving an e :
Ia 73 @BALLEN & CO., INC., Request for ext. of time to & incl. 2/27/73 || ALLEN & CO., INC., ORDER granting ext. of time to & incl. 2/27/73 |
Wh /26,/734 L AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE, Request for ext. of time to 10 days from tdda| L AM'n STOCK EXCHANGE, ORDER granting ext. of time to & incl. 3/7/73 |
3/1/73 HA KLEINER BELL response to show cmuse order w/cert. of service |
3/1/7344| ARTHUR YOUNG & CO. response and averments to show cause order w/cert. of servicr
3/1/73MP Commonwealth's memorandum in support of transfer w/cert of service |
3/5/17 BERRY PETRO M CO ADAMS & PECK, N.D X A-3-6579~-
1) . -
8/732 | ELY LANDAU request for extension to file response to Berry Petroleu
Show Cause Order — GRANTED
£33 9/73a4 BERRY PETROLEUM V. ADAMS AND PECK- REguest from plaintiff for extension
| ORDER - extending to plaintiff March 14, 1973 to file and serve said reply |
3/14/7349 BERRY PETROLEUM CO. reply brief w/cert. of service. |
3/16/73 fetter from Eounsel for Berry Petroleum stating response and brief in reply
3/21/73] (3% TOTA INDUSTRIES response to Berry petroleum reply brief | |
OPINION AND ORDER transferring aCtiom to S.h—ew York tor asetgnnons
| to Judge McFadden for coordinated Of Como oe & eike and
| pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. Notified tOUnsSer, “H-Y==r =7="= "71"

Case MDL No. 37 Document 1 Filed 04/29/15 Page 5 of 12
:
80H —-
Date i = 8 — LL -
f MOTION AND BRIEF =-- Defendants Arthur Young & Co., Allen & Co.
; g and American Stock Exchange to transfer Berry Petroleum v, Adams
and Peck, et al., W.D. TEnn., C.A., No. C-75-484 fortransfer
—_— ; 0 the D,N.Y, under §1407 er
12/22/75 § |REQUEST	FOR EXTENSION -- PLAINTIFF	BERRY PET. CO, --GRANTED	TO ALL
! ee To Dec. 31, 1975 BN
12/22/75 20} RESPONSE -- JOINDER	IN MOTION -= ADAMS	“AND PECK W/cert.	of service	—	12/30/75 | §{ HEARING ORDER -- SETTING Berry Pet. v. Adams & Peck, et al., W.D.Tenn
| . __C.A,	No. C-75-484 -- FOR HEARING, JAN. 23, 1976
I WASH., D.C. SR _ EE eo
1/5/75 457. § RESPONSE -- BERRY PETROLEUM, J. E., O'DANIAL, YVONNE LAW,
§ GERLAND	P. PATTEN & CO., INC. w/ cert/	of servoce
1/15/75 §58§ REPLY BRIEF -- ARUTHR ANDERSON --"¥ ~W/CERT. OFSERVICE
b/4/176 f OPINION AND ORD R_ == DENYING TRANSFER QF (F=1) Berry Petroleum Co., et al
ee eee	..Adams. and Peck, W.D. Tenn., C.A. Na. C-75-484
-_ 4 _

- ~_.. Opinion and Order of May 4, 1970 DOCKET N 37
Cr 312 Fed. Supp. 909 (1970) ] =>
a. DOCKET, =-- JUDICIAL PANEL, ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION fp So
== 8 : sheep 7 0 [22 oF
Description of Litigation 2 Phar	SeR. (9/2/73 )- ) ayy. -
wr MULTIDISTRICT LITIATION RESULTING FROM THE SEEBURE-COMMONWLATF'H [TN a MERGER
- 0 SL y 4s
| 1) J AN SEE A b= BD LH 4, " I DISTRICT & | TRANSFER
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER} JUDGE DATE MISC.
A-1/ Waritz, por 30%, 25/72 I11., N. -} 74/70	et al. 69 C 2621 Agampbel . EA
STE CHEN J aE y
a-2 A QUEEHEN To al. vy. 48RF al laa JN-Y. S P—
C =a) NN] 69 C 5735 | ’ 7ow QHEKELEE ya Acf FEEL. //al, oofA-3 A ndy et-air v. Commonw¢alt AR yet Lf N.Y., S. QR! Laixrit yPr. c44 |et al. ZZ,, Cdlgloarilxel Yin eo taro JogGUILE
, |ennrLESs Ap’ Blue a | Loag™ —a-4 H Nemarow, et al. v. Rozet, et al. N.Y., S. \ / y 2
“J69 Cc 4342 | bd
a-5/f |albert TAH sap al cbrsiadBsPE ini ted| Woy 4 S. Tr. ste
corp LAL 2 \= A355 I re 276
A-6/ Lonle # Seeb C 21 if7¢	-6/,|Sanders’ v. Seeburg Corp., ei so elbedayare { y 7
. (70 Civ. 19449 ~t-3-8-34 ‘ 257 “ . Cid
a-7H]clarence Dp. Firste AY @alif., C. |< a 2 Ay Jo	United Corp., etWAl. (70 Civ. 19%3) "1 69-1389-WpG] {Gray ry, 7 7/70 |
B-1 fffrobert R. senningaf psoas? 0 Ala., N.© NcFadde 5/7 /of7:	United Corp., - (70 v.F16{€2 CA 69-661 |_ a
€-1j4|Jerry Pierce Vv. Cox onwea h_ United FV alif, 1 ee i .
Corp., et al. 2 0 Civ. 1992 (89-1339-wee] Gray |G 7/70 -	a lddwe R. BeueE f oe
c-2 Kr Abby © \Rozet = gleam) PP N.Y, S.J. ARV .	i ER mawv PE
® Wy ns — S50. 0we-3 A[Fauntv. comnoneat of Fodor ef 71a Y., S. ® H~ WOof 7a £ EVE At I Ena se <n SE
Berga - Q
c-4 i Lednoff v. camon oa, AL. SLY , S.. on 93Fs 92 IF, 7 2 a — JUROR VINNPONS Tu S——— 5 on . bd ts
[So pacer BY ~~ i 53° vy
c-5 A Teuchtler, v. Martin y 2 S./o 1 yo Se = oOLak / y Fox2 ) ¥ LX o "
990 ren © | — TTA | ©
c-6	A) [Wildman v. Co waalth Unit $7; iN me YO a © -
Y 2773 {5306 A S—_— =>	| | kobe 2 foi N ey
~e-7 gabe 2 on v. Copgmonwealgth United Corp. ~AN.Y., S. 69 FY
al "4 MRL 5378 —1—T w
A Ce 11.1] CA YIU
D-1,% Morton Teil Yb LCT Yat urg &: { 4 JOR I11. Pp) . & ws ne Cae	XXX® (70 Civ. 196 4%0-"C 360. CEE |
LX)
#?

| DOCKET NO. 37
TAG-ALONG CASES —
DOCKET -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Ne
a	
———eeeeereeee	ee ——————
@ Description of Litigationo MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION RESULTING FROM THE SEEBURG-COMMONWEALTH UNITED MERGER
——————————
NO. CAPTION D.C. NUMBER{t+-JUDGE DATE MISC.
E-1 Robert	R,. Jenning, et al v. Merrill gale, N- SLA OX Co___Lyfich, Pierce, Fenher.& Smith; Enc. | CA 7 " 44 Rick - A Lasecs VEE se NS 4715/70 | 2
E-2 Robert Sohn and Wallage: alner v. Commop| I11./. N:. 7 i"	. ~~ J ed - pw... 5 - . or = ~~ Z] <£
wealth United Cofp., eta 77. or LET Ba 2753[72 Eri 2253) 2/7( “2/00
PE-3 Polaris Fund Ing. v. Comm ny th _nited), a H.DA A Case “ey,
Corp. et al(95 C10 375%) 7) FO=L228 HP 4 rie VE.Ly
E-4 | Jack Mr 8/72	ck B. Crawfgdg, et al v. Couuongealth D4 CaTif. R 2/12 Re	X 7L720 | 17
United CofC" 2 > Lr 23g T0-1720-R FEArzrae . ] Su —
; j wm)	E-5 | Walden Robert CassSt¥og V.7Cemmonwed .D. Calif. ‘YA a
United Corpora (do Lk EY .9<1920~DWW 1g ZI
. ely Se 7 f ,
E-6 Malcolm L. Strauss v. Commonwealth UnitedE.D. Mo. CT 4 ok % JY. q/ y
Corp., et al /2-/¥- 70 . Sa ~¥ os / J
F-1 Harry M. Porkg rat al. v,JBhke Seepurg C.D. 1 Lor Aen :Corp.,	et al. 5 ( y r21-10=2 745 YD,(/
F-2 E. Baden Powell pfig Jean Marvin Powell AS
Vv. onl sa BL ST CE, PEpner Bs == HE TIE 9 /Smith e////7/ Ea, 2 ST ‘ / 7/ 7/ ay 37%70 hoeofeA? Ze Be —L AHA
@--: J.E. O'Daniel, et al. v. Commonwealth W.D. Arkansgs g 5 2 «KX.g United Corp., et al. AED-71-C<15 ; 2/
F-4 Berry Petroleum Co. v. Commonwealth W.D.Arkansa 3 Ke yr, J
_ United Corp, et al. ED-70=C-58 sit Nasz/XYZ- l¢Bernard Weber fiommopyealth United otpf N.Y., S. d/
et al 7 ’ ; Le] A Case	XYZ-2 | Stanley Hershfap ,Comnogwealgh United, : x . :
Corp., et al & 4 = 7 EFS 0 Civ 938 "A Case
YZ-3 Julius L. Baller v.-Commonwealth United4 N.Y., S. | —, wt
Corp., et al A ARTI Laspratanipr WAT A Case
G-1 Berry Petrology So),v. Ada EP N.D.Texas |todd Sai > Jie Jr3et al. A Ze FTF) (Cpr A679 70 se SSE
Ztichial oo A RY I Santer |J |, Bese tts: pet dotaThey (1roesy (975 DN ford 12

Case MDL NgpggrPafyment 1, Filgsbn4/28G5p	Page 8 of 12 PAGE
——— —
Intra- District Civil Date of
Office and Action Transfer| Transferee| Dismissal
Number Caption Judge Number Date Docket No.| or Remand Mise.
F-1 perry lroleum Sof €t 3x. .D. Tenn" C75-484	Adams A(F. [ETE |
| Pa Les JS nd3 py. uo . i io) 7
a — /Ya / 7 ) Oran
ely Ss ya ( ~)a AS pl? eh He ‘ ,
py PA g 7 C4 : J ? rf me >
A | |	\ = oy ER a
bl, LS Y 2 ll - ;	J ]a AA Cie | |
2 Z JU em Hreaae	4 |
< 7 Be yZ {{ Pero yor - dAp

ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
®__ 0	oosscrremiowornrmieamoy
This list adopted from pleading No. 55 @,
No. Plaintiff Defendant
Berry Petroleum Company, et al. v. Adqms & Peck, et al.,
C W.D. Tennessee, C.A. No. C75-484
Keith, Clegg & Eckert
Drawer A.
Magnolia, Arkansas 71753
Locke, Purnell, Boren, Laney & Neely
i 36th Floor
Republic Bank Building
. Dallas, Texas 75201
Lester and Schults
: 2000 Worthen Bank Building
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
4 Attorneys for Plaintiffsthong w/a nJp. &°	{impeach acndd % Ei t 7One Battery Park Plaza
NewYork, New York 10004
Attorneys for Defendant Adams & Peck
Holzman, Wise & Shepard
30 Broad Street
C New York, New York 10004Attorneys for Defendant Allen & Co., Inc.
Lord, Day & Lord
25 Broadway
New York, New York 10004
Attorneys for Defendant American Stock
FRG	L rr, £359,
én ACL SACI fuer & Feld
2800 Republic National Bank Building
Dallas, Texas 75201
C Attorneys for Defendant James A.	Lewis Engineering
OBrien, Rafery, Rosenbloom & Grainger
152 West 42nd Street
New York, New York 10036
Attorneys for Defendant Variety, Inc.

c/
No. | platnware	| Defendant oo
Rogers & Cowan, Inc. oo C	9665 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90024
In re Seeburg~-Commonwealth UnitedfLitigation, M-19-95
Berkowitz, Lefkovitz & Patrick
1400 City National Bank Building
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Kaufman, Taylor, Kimmel. & Miller
41 East 42nd Street C	New York, New York 10017
Attorneys for Land class plaintiffs
Edward Nathan, Esquire
345 Park Avenue
Suite 2404
New York, New York 10022
Bailey Marshall Hoeniger & Freita
345 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022 :
Attorneys for Land derivatQve plaintiffs
Prins, Flamm & Susman
33 North Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Attorneys for Fried class plaintiffs
Kaler, Worsley, Daniel & Hollman
710 Ring Building
Washington, D.C. 20036
Attorneys for Seeburg derivative plaintiffs C
Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers
220 East 42nd STreet
New York, New York 10017
Attorneys for defendnats
Burns, Van Kirk, Greene & Kafer
521 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Attorneys for Iota Industries,

ATTORNEY LIST -- JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (3)ee
C DESCRIPTION OF LITIGATION
Ce —
Gerald Lipsky, etc. Vv. Commonwealth Urlited Corp., et al.,
C S.D. N.Y. 70 Civ. 5030Patterson, Belknap & Webb
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10020
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers
220 East 42nd Street
New York, New York 10017
Attorneys for Defendants and Third-Pagty Plaintiffs
Lord, Day & Lord .
25 Broadway ol
New York, New York 10004
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendants
Morton Teitelbaum v. The Seeburg Corp.|, et al., S.D.N.Y.,
C.A. No. 69 Civ. 5736
Stuart D. Perlman, Esq.
14 East 32nd Street
New York, New York 10016
C Speranza & Veverka	230 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers
220 East 42nd Street x
New York, New York 10017
Attorneys for Defendants

No. Defendant
" ARTHUR YOUNG & CO. a
P. B. Konrad Knake, Esquire CWhite & Case
14 Wall STreet
New York, New York 10005
ALLEN & GOMFANY.
Frank P. Broz, Esquire
Holzman, Wise & Shepari
30 Broad Street
New York, New ¥ork 10004
AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE
John. J. Loflin, Esquire o
Lord, Day & Lord
25 Broadway
New York, New York 10004