USA v. ALEXANDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	Cause No. 1:18-cr-0003-JMS-MG
)
TERRANCE ALEXANDER, 	) 	- 01
)
Defendant. 	)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On February 19, 2026, the Court held a hearing on the Petition for Warrant
or Summons for Offender Under Supervision filed on January 22, 2026. Defendant
appeared in person with his appointed counsel Bill Dazey. The government
appeared by Cristina Caraballo-Colón, Assistant United States Attorney. The U. S.
Parole and Probation appeared by Officer Kristy Talley.
The Court conducted the following procedures in accordance with Fed. R.
Crim. P. 32.1(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 3583:
1. The Court advised Defendant of his rights and provided him with a
copy of the petition. Defendant Alexander orally waived his right to a preliminary
hearing.
2. 	After being placed under oath, Defendant admitted Violations # 1 and
2. [Dkt. 68.]
3. 	The allegations to which Defendant admitted, as fully set forth in the
petition, are:
Case 1:18-cr-00003-JMS-MG Document 77 Filed 02/24/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
Violation
Number 	Nature of Noncompliance
1 	“You shall not use or possess any controlled substances
prohibited 	by 	applicable 	state 	or 	federal 	law, 	unless
authorized to do so by a valid prescription from a licensed
medical practitioner. You shall follow the prescription
instructions regarding frequency and dosage.”
On January 12, 2026, Mr. Alexander submitted a urine drug
screen that returned positive for fentanyl.
As previously reported to the Court, on December 17, 2025, Mr.
Alexander submitted a urine drug screen that returned positive
for amphetamine, cocaine, and synthetic marijuana. On
December 29, 2025, and January 6, 2026, Mr. Alexander
submitted urine drug screens that returned positive for fentanyl.
2 	“You shall maintain lawful full time employment, unless
excused by the probation officer for schooling, vocational
training, 	or 	other 	reasons 	that 	prevent 	lawful
employment.”
On December 17, 2025, Mr. Alexander reported he was fired from
his employer on October 16, 2025. Mr. Alexander has remained
unemployed since.
4. 	The parties stipulated that:
(a) 	The highest grade of violation is a Grade B violation.
(b) 	Defendant’s criminal history category is IV.
(c) 	The advisory range of imprisonment applicable upon revocation
of supervised release, therefore, is 12 to 18 months’
imprisonment.
5. 	The parties jointly recommended a sentence of 15 months'
imprisonment with no supervised release to follow. Defendant requested placement
at FCI Greenville.
Case 1:18-cr-00003-JMS-MG Document 77 Filed 02/24/26 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:
<pageID>

3
The Magistrate Judge, having considered the relevant factors in 18 U.S.C. §
3553(a), see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), and as more fully set forth on the record, finds that
the Defendant violated the conditions in the petition, that his supervised release
should be revoked, and that he should be sentenced to the custody of the Attorney
General or her designee for a period of 15 months with no supervised release to
follow. The Magistrate Judge will make a recommendation of placement at FCI
Greenville. The Defendant is to be taken into custody immediately pending the
District Judge’s action on this Report and Recommendation.
The parties are hereby notified that the District Judge may reconsider any
matter assigned to a Magistrate Judge. The parties waived the fourteen-day period
to object to the Report and Recommendation.
So RECOMMENDED.
Date: 02/24/2026
Case 1:18-cr-00003-JMS-MG Document 77 Filed 02/24/26 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:
<pageID>

4
Distribution:
All ECF-registered counsel of record via email generated by the court’s ECF system
Case 1:18-cr-00003-JMS-MG Document 77 Filed 02/24/26 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:
<pageID>