Xol Rax, et al. v. Big D Builders, Inc., et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF IDAHO
NANCY XOL RAX, individually, and on
behalf of her minor daughter DS, ZULEYMA
R. LOPEZ on behalf of her minor son JS,
GLORIA TZI, and PEDRO SONTAY, JUAN
SONTAY, and MARTHA SONTAY, as
individual heirs of MARIO SONTAY,
and
INGRID SUSANA BOTZOC TZI, DOROTEA
OCH, EMILIANO COC CHUB, and
EMILIANO COC OCH, as individual heirs of
MARIANO COC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BIG D BUILDERS, INC., STEEL BUILDING
SYSTEMS, LLC, INLAND CRANE, INC.,
SPECK STEEL, LLC,
WALKER STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING,
P.C. and NCI GROUP, INC. d/b/a/ METAL
BUILDING COMPONENTS,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 1:24-cv-00319-BLW
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEADLINES
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR BRIEFING
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Deadlines for Briefing of
Plaintiffs’ Request for Leave to Amend Complaint [Dkt. 114] and Defendant Steel Building
Systems, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 115], and good cause appearing:
Case 1:24-cv-00319-BLW Document 118 Filed 04/08/26 Page 1 of 2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. 	Plaintiffs shall have up to and including April 27, 2026, to file their Response to
Defendant Steel Building Systems, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 115].
2. 	Defendant Steel Building Systems, LLC shall have up to and including May 18, 2026, to
file its Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.
3. 	Defendant Steel Building Systems, LLC shall have up to and including April 22, 2026, to
file its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint
[Dkt. 114].
4. 	Plaintiffs shall have the time prescribed by Local Civil Rule 7.1, plus an additional three
(3) days, to file their Reply in support of their Motion for Leave to File Third Amended
Complaint.
5. 	All other deadlines and provisions not expressly modified by this Order shall remain in
full force and effect.
Case 1:24-cv-00319-BLW Document 118 Filed 04/08/26 Page 2 of 2