DAVIS v. PRATER et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATHENS DIVISION
LEONARD LEE DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Officer PRATER, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 3:24-cv-110-TES-CHW
Proceedings Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Before the U.S. Magistrate Judge
ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On October 30, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge filed a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) and ultimately concluded that Defendants’ Motion to Dimsis
[Doc. 12] be granted and that Plaintiff’s motion, docketed as a “Motion for Status and
Request for Ruling” [Doc. 17], be denied as moot. [Doc. 19]. Plaintiff has not timely filed
an objection or sought an extension of time to file an objection within the 14-day period
outlined in the magistrate judge’s R&R. [Id. at pp. 9–10]. Thus, the Court reviews the
R&R for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), in connection with Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1) &
(d).
Having considered the R&R, the Court finds no clear enumeration of error and
agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge.
Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the United States Magistrate Judge’s R&R [Doc. 19] and
Case 3:24-cv-00110-TES-CHW Document 21 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 2

2
MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 12] and DISMISSES this action without
prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion [Doc. 17], docketed as a
“Motion for Status and Request for Ruling,” be DENIED as moot.
SO ORDERED, this 1st day of December, 2025.
S/ Tilman E. Self, III
TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 3:24-cv-00110-TES-CHW Document 21 Filed 12/01/25 Page 2 of 2