MOULTRIE v. MOYLER et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
EDDIE JAMES MOULTRIE,
Plaintiff,
v. 	Case No.: 3:26cv3327-MW/HTC
GRIFFIN MOYLER, et al.,
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, ECF No. 5, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections,
ECF No. 7. This Court has also considered, without hearing, Plaintiff’s motion for
extension of time to file objections. ECF No. 6. The motion for extension, ECF No.
6, is GRANTED. Having considered Plaintiff’s objections,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation, ECF No. 5, is accepted and adopted, over
the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment
stating, “Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice because he failed
to truthfully disclose his litigation history and under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because
Plaintiff is a three-striker, did not pay the filing fee when he commenced this case,
and has not shown he faces imminent danger.” Plaintiff’s motion to exceed the page
Case 3:26-cv-03327-MW-HTC Document 8 Filed 05/05/26 Page 1 of 2

2
limit, ECF No. 2, is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, ECF No. 3, is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.
SO ORDERED on May 5, 2026.
s/Mark E. Walker
United States District Judge
Case 3:26-cv-03327-MW-HTC Document 8 Filed 05/05/26 Page 2 of 2