LIANG v. GREEN ZONE et al

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JULIETTE YAXI LIANG, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 26-1231 (UNA)
)
THE GREEN ZONE, et al.,` )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on initial review of Plaintiff’s application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court will grant
the application, and for the reasons discussed below, dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
“A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to
relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl.
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in
law or in fact” is frivolous, Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989), and the Court cannot
exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint, Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528,
536-37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without
power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and
unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v.
Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir.
2009) (examining cases dismissed “for patent insubstantiality,” including where plaintiff allegedly
“was subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment deriving from uncertain origins.”).
Consequently, a Court is obligated to dismiss a complaint as frivolous “when the facts alleged rise
Case 1:26-cv-01231-UNA Document 3 Filed 06/01/26 Page 1 of 2

2
to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible,” Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33
(1992), or “postulat[e] events and circumstances of a wholly fanciful kind,” Crisafi v. Holland,
655 F.2d 1305, 1307-08 (D.C. Cir. 1981).
This complaint is largely illegible, and the little that can be understood lacks a basis in law
and fact. The complaint is frivolous, and the Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over a frivolous
complaint. A separate order will issue.
DATE: June 1, 2026 /s/
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER
United States District Judge
Case 1:26-cv-01231-UNA Document 3 Filed 06/01/26 Page 2 of 2