Old Master Products, Inc. v. United States

Slip Op. 21–27
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
____________________________________
:
FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) 	:
LIMITED, ET AL., 	:
:
Plaintiffs, 	:
:
and 	:
:
ARMSTRONG WOOD PRODUCTS 	:
(KUNSHAN) CO., LTD., GUANGDONG 	:
YIHUA TIMBER INDUSTRY CO., LTD., :
OLD MASTER PRODUCTS, INC., 	:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS SERVICES, 	:
LLC, SHANGHAI LAIRUNDE WOOD 	: 	Before: Richard K. Eaton, Judge
CO., LTD., CHANGZHOU HAWD 	:
FLOORING CO., LTD., DALIAN 	: 	Consol. Court No. 16-00145
HUILONG WOODEN PRODUCTS CO., 	:
LTD., DUNHUA CITY JISEN WOOD 	:
INDUSTRY CO., LTD., DUNHUA CITY 	:
DEXIN WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., 	:
DUNHUA CITY HONGYUAN WOOD 	:
INDUSTRY CO., LTD., JIAXING 	:
HENGTONG WOOD CO., LTD., 	:
KARLY WOOD PRODUCT LIMITED, 	:
YINGYI-NATURE (KUNSHAN) WOOD 	:
INDUSTRY CO., LTD., XIAMEN YUNG 	:
DE ORNAMENT CO., LTD., ZHEJIANG 	:
SHUIMOJIANGNAN NEW MATERIAL 	:
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 	:
:
Plaintiff-Intervenors, 	:
:
v. 	:
:
UNITED STATES, 	:
:
Defendant. 	:
____________________________________:
JUDGMENT
Before the court is the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the
Case 1:16-cv-00148-RKE Document 60 Filed 03/03/21 Page 1 of 3

Consol. Court No. 16-00145 	Page 2
“Department”) corrected remand redetermination (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 183, issued
pursuant to the court’s order dated August 25, 2020, ECF No. 174.
Because individually examined respondent and Plaintiff Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited
is no longer subject to the antidumping duty order on multilayered wood flooring from China, 1 it
was necessary for Commerce to recalculate its separate rate. See Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd.
v. United States, No. 2019-1499, 2020 WL 8254416, at *1 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2020) (citing
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United States, 947 F.3d 781, 793-94 (Fed. Cir. 2020)).
In its August 25, 2020 order, the court directed Commerce to reconsider its calculation of
the rate applicable to separate rate respondents, and dismissed Plaintiff-Intervenor Armstrong
Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. from the case.
In response, Commerce issued the Remand Results, stating that
Commerce has revised the separate rate for those companies which were granted a separate
rate in the Final Results and were party to this litigation. The revised separate rate is 0.00
percent, based solely on [Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./ Dalian Shumaike
Floor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.’s] weighted-average dumping margin.
Remand Results at 6.
The court finds that Commerce has complied with its instructions because the Department
recalculated the rate applicable to separate rate respondents based on the sole remaining
individually examined respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin.
No party contests the Remand Results. See Certain Consol. Pls.’ Comments on Corrected
Remand Redetermination, ECF No. 185; Certain Consol. Pls.’ Comments on Remand Results,
ECF. No. 186; Pl.-Intervenor Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co.’s Comments on Remand
1 	See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s Rep. of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 Fed. Reg. 76,690
(Dep’t Commerce Dec. 8, 2011), as amended in Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People’s
Rep. of China: Amended Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 Fed. Reg. 5484 (Dep’t
Commerce Feb. 3, 2012).
Case 1:16-cv-00148-RKE Document 60 Filed 03/03/21 Page 2 of 3

Consol. Court No. 16-00145 	Page 3
Results, ECF No. 187; Def.’s Comments on Remand Results, ECF No. 188. There being no further
dispute in this matter, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained.
/s/ Richard K. Eaton
Richard K. Eaton, Judge
Dated: 	March 3, 2021
New York, New York
Case 1:16-cv-00148-RKE Document 60 Filed 03/03/21 Page 3 of 3