Uribe Trejo v. LaRose et al

1
3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEATRIZ URIBE TREJO,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE; SIDNEY
AKI; TODD LYONS; KRISTI NOEM;
PAMELA BONDI; U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S.
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM
ENFORCEMENT,
Respondents.
Case No.: 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT (1)
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS and (2) TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
[ECF Nos. 1, 5]
Before the Court is Petitioner Beatriz Uribe Trejo’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
(“TRO”). ECF Nos. 1, 5. After Petitioner was granted a bond hearing, the parties filed a
number of status updates with the Court. See ECF Nos. 11-14, 16. In the latest status report
filed by the parties as ordered by the Court, the parties agree that Petitioner has been
released from custody on bond and that she is not subject to any restrictions. ECF No. 16
at 1. As such, Respondents argue that there is no further relief that the Court can grant and
the petition should be dismissed at this time. Id. at 7-8. On the other hand, Petitioner
responds with several other requests for relief including: (1) “this Court order that no re-
Case 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 PageID.<pageID>
Page 1 of 2

2
3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
detention or any Alternatives to Detention (ATD) can be ordered in connection with the
present removal proceedings;” (2) “this Court order the return of Petitioner’s identity
documents still being help by ICE; and (3) “the Court to direct USCIS to adjudicate the
application in order to protect Petitioner’s liberty interest and can stop the infringement of
Petitioner’s rights.” Id. at 7. The Court does not find that any of this additional relief is
appropriate under a habeas petition where Petitioner has already been physically released
from custody. Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT the petition and accompany
TRO motion at this time. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to CLOSE this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2026
Case 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 PageID.<pageID>
Page 2 of 2