USA v. Muri et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
Roger Muri (1)
Defendant.
IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that:
IZl
□
□
□
□
□
IZl
an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendsiμ~ and the Court has
granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, '07ithout prejudice; or
the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or
the Court has granted the motion of the Governm'ent for dismissal, witq9ut prejudice; or
the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for a judgment of acquittal; or
a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or
the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty;
of the offense(s) as charged in the lttaietmeffiflnformation:
Dated: 	3/4/26
----------
nited States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:25-cr-04560-JLS Document 68 Filed 03/04/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1
of 1