5:25-cv-01644•Invisible Narratives v. Next Level Apps Technology - FZCO
Testo completo
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 118 Bobby A. Ghajar (SBN 198719) Aastha Rajdeep Sharma (SBN 366392) COOLEY LLP 355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 900 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: 310.883.6400 Email: bghajar@cooley.com Stephanie Schuyler (Pro Hac Vice) COOLEY LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, New York 10001 Telephone: (212) 479-6000 Email: sschuyler@cooley.com Amy L. Kramer (Pro Hac Vice) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 1144 15th Street, Suite 3300 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: 303.572.6500 Email: Amy.Kramer@gtlaw.com Justin A. MacLean (Pro Hac Vice) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP One Vanderbilt Avenue New York, New York 10017 Telephone: 212.801.9200 Email: Justin.MacLean@gtlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Invisible Narratives LLC Jonathan Lagarenne (Pro Hac Vice) Cali Spota (Pro Hac Vice) Jonathan Madara (Pro Hac Vice) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 212 Carnegie Center, Suite 400 Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Email: jsmedley@foxrothschild.com cspota@foxrothschild.com Jack Praetzellis (SBN 267765) FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 345 California Street, Suite 2200 San Francisco, California 94104 Email:jpraetzellis@foxrothschild.com John Joseph Shaeffer (SBN138331) FOX ROTHSCHILD 10250 Constellation Blvd, Ste 900 Los Angeles, California 90067-6275 Email: jshaeffer@foxrothschild.com Attorneys for Defendant Next Level Apps Technology – FZCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INVISIBLE NARRATIVES LLC, Plaintiff, v. NEXT LEVEL APPS TECHNOLOGY – FZCO, Defendant. CASE NO. 5:25-cv-01644-NW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING AGREEMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, FEES AND COSTS CONTEMPLATED BY ORDER OF APRIL 1, 2026 (ECF NO. 118) Case 5:25-cv-01644-NW Document 126 Filed 04/21/26 Page 1 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 118 Plaintiff Invisible Narratives LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Next Level Apps Technology–FZCO (“Defendant”) (collectively the “Parties”), hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties previously disputed the propriety of Defendant’s filing of Second Amended Counterclaims and Amended Answer (the “SACC,” ECF Nos. 84, 86), and the Parties submitted multiple filings related to the dispute over the propriety of the SACC, including full briefing on Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and Dismiss the SACC (the “Motion to Strike,” ECF Nos. 90, 97, 103), and briefing on Defendant’s Administrative Motion for Extension of Time to file the SACC (ECF Nos. 107, 110); WHEREAS, on April 1, 2026, the Court issued an order (the “April 1 Order”) that granted Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike, denied Defendant’s motion for an extension of time to file the SACC, permitted Defendant to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Counterclaims by April 8, 2026, and ordered Plaintiff to file any reply by April 15, 2026; WHEREAS, the April 1 Order provided that “[n]othing in this Order prevents Invisible Narratives from seeking sanctions or moving for attorney’s fees, but Invisible Narratives must do so by April 15, 2026” (ECF No. 118); WHEREAS, the Parties stipulated to extend the deadlines set forth in ECF No. 118 (ECF No. 119), which the Court granted (ECF No. 120); WHEREAS, on April 8, 2026, counsel for Plaintiff advised counsel for Defendant that Plaintiff intended to move for sanctions pursuant to ECF No. 118; WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred regarding Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for sanctions, counsel fees and costs and to avoid motion practice and the interest of efficiency and economy, Defendant’s counsel, Fox Rothschild LLP agreed to stipulate to the amount of attorneys’ fees to be paid to Plaintiff to resolve the anticipated motion for sanctions per ECF No. 118; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that: 1. Defendant’s counsel, Fox Rothschild LLP, will pay $105,000 (USD) to Plaintiff by April 16, 2026, by check provided to Plaintiff’s counsel by courier. Case 5:25-cv-01644-NW Document 126 Filed 04/21/26 Page 2 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 118 2. The Parties agree that this Stipulation, and the payment pursuant to it, is solely to avoid and resolve Plaintiff’s anticipated motion for sanctions invited by the Court’s Order at ECF No. 118 and is without prejudice to the Parties’ right to seek sanctions and/or attorneys’ fees related to any other issue in this Action, including but not limited to Plaintiff’s right to seek potential relief pending the outcome of Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Counterclaims (ECF No. 62), regarding which briefing is ongoing (ECF Nos. 78, 123) and Defendant’s right to oppose any such potential relief. Respectfully submitted, DATED: April 15, 2026 COOLEY LLP By /s/ Bobby Ghajar Bobby A. Ghajar Stephanie Schuyler Attorneys for Plaintiff Invisible Narratives LLC DATED: April 15, 2026 FOX ROTHSCHILD, LLP By /s/ Cali Spota Cali Spota Attorneys for Defendant Next Level Apps Technology – FZCO Case 5:25-cv-01644-NW Document 126 Filed 04/21/26 Page 3 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 118 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3): I, Bobby Ghajar, counsel for Plaintiff, attest that all Signatories have concurred in the filing of the document. DATED: April 15, 2026 COOLEY LLP By /s/ Bobby Ghajar Bobby Ghajar Attorneys for Plaintiff Invisible Narratives LLC Case 5:25-cv-01644-NW Document 126 Filed 04/21/26 Page 4 of 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO ECF NO. 118 [PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________, 2026 By: Hon. Noël Wise UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE April 21 U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T CO U R T N O R T H E R N D I S T R I C T O F C A L I F O R N I A GRANTED Judge Noël Wise Case 5:25-cv-01644-NW Document 126 Filed 04/21/26 Page 5 of 5
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.